@hbdchick No, but if you got any friends in the vicinity, you shout: "Anybody going to help me deal with this sick maniac."
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness yes. but, once again, the open boders people are not sick, and you're misguiding your friends and leading to misunderstanding.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
.
@Outsideness just because you don't like something doesn't make it pathological.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness@hbdchick in strict evolutionary terms, I think there is a fitness problem here2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @declamare
@declamare Yes,@hbdchick maintains that consistent radical unfitness can be completely devoid of pathology. Darwinian scholasticism.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@Outsideness no. i'm just saying that in this case, i really don't think it's pathological. seems unlikely that an average...@declamare1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@Outsideness ...set of traits of entire populations would be pathological.@declamare5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@declamare If the entire population dies out, saying "but there was nothing remotely pathological about it" is pure scholasticism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
@hbdchick@declamare ... Successful adaptation is the ONLY criterion that matters, and the only reason to be concerned about pathologies.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Outsideness the first half of your statement is correct.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.