@JSBTC i think that a bad tack. if they really are hyper-universalists, then maybe point out that *they* leave some out. @DIA_operative
.@Nick_B_Steves there are also bad IRL consequences to too much in-group altruism (see: syria), so pick your poison. @DIA_operative @JSBTC
-
-
@amerika_blog it can do. (^_^) can depend on if your particular flavor matches your environment.@Nick_B_Steves@DIA_operative@JSBTC -
@amerika_blog mostly altruistic behaviors make societies work (in various ways), so we're stuck w/it.@Nick_B_Steves@DIA_operative@JSBTC
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@hbdchick@DIA_operative@JSBTC A stretch perhap. Obv, social tech shld operate to avoid too much anything of which there can be too much. -
@Nick_B_Steves but it doesn't operate like that. traits get selected for in one environ and then wind up in another.@DIA_operative@JSBTC -
@hbdchick@DIA_operative@JSBTC Until they get UN-selected. And morph into better, more advantageous traits. -
@Nick_B_Steves ...as long as that new environment lasts.#TimeIsAFlatCircle (~_^)@DIA_operative@JSBTC
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@prez_davis It's debatable how much behavioral traits are given to recursive modification....@hbdchick@Nick_B_Steves -
Tweet unavailable
-
@prez_davis Yes, intelligence is our most powerful selective trait, we would do well not to forget that.@hbdchick@Nick_B_Steves
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.