I have to write another post explaining why diversity *in and of itself* is not a bad thing. See National Prosperityhttp://www.unz.com/jman/national-prosperity/ …
-
-
Replying to @JayMan471
Clannish-ness is common enough in most human societies, I think, that the difference is largely academic
@JayMan471@hbdchick2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
@Eidotheia no. the difference is largely IRL. see: success of The West.@JayMan4711 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
Success in the West was largely a function of non-clannishness? I understand 'clannish' isn't necessarily racial >
@hbdchick@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
@Eidotheia iq extremely important, obv. can't get anywhere w/out intelligence. then non-clannishness a big help...@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hbdchick
How is non-clannishness important?
@hbdchick@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
.
@Eidotheia getting rid of as much nepotistic altruism as possible means you can trust nearly any random stranger. society flows.@JayMan4711 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
Trusting random strangers as much as family/tribe/clan does not seem to be a winning strategy, overall
@hbdchick@JayMan4713 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Eidotheia built the modern world as we know it! universalism, ftw. @JayMan471
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.