I have to write another post explaining why diversity *in and of itself* is not a bad thing. See National Prosperityhttp://www.unz.com/jman/national-prosperity/ …
-
-
Replying to @JayMan471
Clannish-ness is common enough in most human societies, I think, that the difference is largely academic
@JayMan471@hbdchick2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
@Eidotheia no. the difference is largely IRL. see: success of The West.@JayMan4711 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
Success in the West was largely a function of non-clannishness? I understand 'clannish' isn't necessarily racial >
@hbdchick@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
@Eidotheia iq extremely important, obv. can't get anywhere w/out intelligence. then non-clannishness a big help...@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hbdchick
@Eidotheia ...in contrast to outbred, universalistic nw euros, see southern euros, east euros, even irish!@JayMan4711 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
I wasn't aware the Irish weren't "successful". Not to say that homogeneity means success, but is conducive.
@hbdchick@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
@Eidotheia yeah. 'cause irish were the first to put a man on the moon! (~_^) no. not very successful compared to other nw euros.@JayMan4711 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
I believe they count as a first-world nation, which is pretty successful. Also, are they racially distinct?
@hbdchick@JayMan4712 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eidotheia
@Eidotheia they (we) weren't one of the drivers creating the first world. not really. riding on coattails of other nw euros, jmo.@JayMan4711 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.