@bobiblazeski 20? minimum. 30, 40 even better. plus you gotta make nepotism not reproductively beneficial anymore. @JayMan471 @Paradigmian
-
-
@hbdchick@bobiblazeski@JayMan471@Paradigmian Preferably in any numbers. -
.
@BassBaseBearder Western societies can easily absorb small numbers of select immigrants. Beneficial@hbdchick@bobiblazeski@Paradigmian -
@JayMan471@hbdchick@Paradigmian Benefit is questionable at best.That's before we discuss total failure of any existing system of screening -
.
@BassBaseBearder It's easy to screen for quality immigrants, if Western governments so chose. See Canada.@hbdchick@Paradigmian -
@JayMan471@hbdchick@Paradigmian I would not call Canada's screening successful. -
@JayMan471@hbdchick@Paradigmian Successful screening requires far more than screening for degrees and other proxies of IQ. -
@JayMan471@hbdchick@Paradigmian Until we can do screening at genetic level (if possible at all), screening will fail.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.