@IronEconomist @hbdchick @roreiy I prefer not to clear up some confusion with something that might confuse people even more,even if accurate
-
-
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@IronEconomist@hbdchick@roreiy remember we're talking about teaching science to the plebs here. oh excuse me, TW: Elitism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@SilverVVulpes@hbdchick@roreiy The problem with these things is that they are fundamentally complex. So hard to stay on message.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IronEconomist
@IronEconomist@hbdchick@roreiy yes,but I think you do away with some of the complexity if you focus on gametes produced. As I say in the…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@IronEconomist@hbdchick@roreiy thread, many counterexamples or exceptions go away if you don't focus on genitals and chromosomes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@SilverVVulpes you men need to#CheckYourGameteProductionPrivilege. you really do! hmpf.@IronEconomist@roreiy2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@IronEconomist@roreiy you should have CHOSEN to have gametes that keep being produced instead of your big fat limited ones2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@SilverVVulpes@hbdchick@roreiy But then you get chimera-ism, when people produce gametes genetically unrelated to themselves...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IronEconomist
@IronEconomist@hbdchick@roreiy yes, but chimeras are relatively unknown at least compared with Turner, Klinefelter, intersexuals.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@IronEconomist@hbdchick@roreiy More uncommon too, unless you happen to be a marmoset.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.