@hbdchick wonder if his opinion would have changed even one bit if he was still with us, despiste 15 years of hard tries
-
-
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@SilverVVulpes well, he didn't dismiss epigenetics entirely. just not for humans (human intelligence, specifically.)pic.twitter.com/t2fEQfKRNi
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@hbdchick meaning,it just screws up regular development of the nervous system, the children if not exposed to same problem turns up fine.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@hbdchick Which simply means "don't expose a developing fetus to toxic shit", which we knew already. No place for Lamarck here.1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@hbdchick As Cochran and others say,seriously, where's the mechanism were information from the enviroment crosses the somatic-germinal line?2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@hbdchick for the poot and STILL when applied to populations of millions, fixing them could improve a lot of lives3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
@hbdchick poor* I'm angry and MY computer is working slowly to make me even angry so I keep make typos. curse you bill gates1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.