@amerika_blog yeah, but he didn't like darwin's dangerous idea in many ways. i think he rather lost the plot when it came to nat selec.
-
-
Replying to @amerika_blog
@amerika_blog ...otherwise i think he really went down the wrong path when thinking about evolution. shame.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amerika_blog
@amerika_blog here you go. this is the sort of thing i'm thinking of: Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Critique of Darwin http://www.academia.edu/759427/Nietzsche_s_Aesthetic_Critique_of_Darwin …7 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @amerika_blog
@amerika_blog ...as saying the struggle for existence is just an exception. i mean...no. just no. (>.<) he really didn't get - or didn't...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amerika_blog
@amerika_blog eh? N says nothing about branching there. just that struggle for survival is an exception. ?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@amerika_blog organisms don't have motivations that encourage their adaptations. *evolution* (one way via nat selec) results in adaptations.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.