@pseudoerasmus I suppose. But, here A) almost doesn't count B) It's not like trust measures necessarily mean anything anyway @whyvert @bswud
-
-
Replying to @JayMan471
@pseudoerasmus And like I said, some correlations (the ones we use, for that reason) are better than others.@whyvert@bswud1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JayMan471
@JayMan471@whyvert@bswud is that argumentum ad jaymanum or argument ad jaychickum ?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@pseudoerasmus Let's wait for@hbdchick to chime in on it. :)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asherjj74
@asherjj74@JayMan471@hbdchick they are not, usually; but in this case, q. was about ethnic subgroup representation7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@pseudoerasmus@asherjj74@JayMan471 N.I. was merely an example of how diff subgroups can distrust others.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@asherjj74@hbdchick I had also used the phrase "identifiable subgroup", since RO is overwhelmingly Romanian & Orthodox, what subgroups ?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@pseudoerasmus@asherjj74 certain religious groups, perhaps? certain class groups?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@asherjj74@hbdchick can I tell you get a grip again without you going nuts ?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@pseudoerasmus @asherjj74 i'm just *asking a question* after all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.