So @OwenJones84 says that in future we will look at statements like “trans women are not, by definition, biological females" in the same…>
-
-
Replying to @TomChivers
…way that we look now at 1950s comments on race and so on. Is that likely? Won't that mean denying the existence of the X chromosome?
16 replies 12 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @TomChivers
immediately nervous about writing this, and am completely pro trans rights, but idea that trans women are biologically female is v odd to me
34 replies 19 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @TomChivers
@TomChivers the science of sex is, you know, not exactly clear cut4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @flashboy
@flashboy@TomChivers Maybe the idea is that 'female' isn't a biological category because your chromosomes don't determine your gender.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MikeBenchCapon
@flashboy@TomChivers And so we'll look back on attempts to biologize social categories the way we look back on head measuring.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeBenchCapon
@MikeBenchCapon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_size@flashboy@TomChiverspic.twitter.com/yEWGXhMXOv
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JayMan471
@JayMan471 I'm not really sure what to do with this information.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeBenchCapon
@MikeBenchCapon@JayMan471 “To remember it — to docket it. We may come on something later which will bear upon it." - s.holmes. (^_^)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@NihilistSS @MikeBenchCapon @JayMan471 not a race. (not *everything* is race!) some population(s) in e. africa. dunno who. don't think...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.