.@DrZhana Well this biologist at least is crazy.
-
-
Replying to @JayMan471
@JayMan471@hbdchick@DrZhana What percentage of human species is neither XX nor XY?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jeffrey_of_Troy
@Jeffrey_of_Troy@hbdchick@DrZhana Vanishingly small.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JayMan471
@JayMan471@Jeffrey_of_Troy@hbdchick not according to this review paper: 1 in 100. 1% is not that small http://www.nature.com/articles/nrendo.2014.130.epdf?referrer_access_token=SD7AOAYP3JIhWIMQ2lV2s9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0Ndc5r3LOxGLdoKRS4ZyLlEc8ecF7Y1ecLbQ-JyNpz7h8f0UlBdpaMFCpsuRjw5D_EcbGhhaKkiQOMXKzFDkaa6 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrZhana
@DrZhana@JayMan471@Jeffrey_of_Troy d*mn paywall! just to be clear: 1% is neither XX nor XY?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JayMan471@Jeffrey_of_Troy either way, here's the relevant definitionpic.twitter.com/DH1WH060Gg
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrZhana
@DrZhana@JayMan471@Jeffrey_of_Troy so this definition doesn't depend only on chromosomal distinction. which is debatable. and is debated!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JayMan471 Chromosomal sex is only 1 of 3 determinants, other 2 being hormonal & genital, so those variations could arguably count1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DrZhana
@DrZhana@JayMan471 yeah, could arguably. (i don't really want to argue over this. was just curious what the definitions were! (^_^) )1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JayMan471 yeah, me neither. not my battle :)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.