-
-
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@Scholars_Stage@hbdchick And this is why behavioral genetics is the bedrock of social science. All those methods are completely useless...2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JayMan471
@Scholars_Stage@hbdchick ...because they are genetically confounded. When you use genetic methods, you get no effect (0 shared environment)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JayMan471
@JayMan471@Scholars_Stage yes. these studies don't rule out possibility that cads pass on their neg behavioral traits genes to their kids.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JayMan471 No, they do. Did you read the paper? The entire point is to see if "an unmeasured variable is causing both family4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@Scholars_Stage@JayMan471 the best studies included in that review are probably the d’onofrio et al. ones.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JayMan471 Well then what is your take on the Siblings Fixed Effect models- specifically the ones that w/2 biological siblings?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@Scholars_Stage@JayMan471 ...*genetic* differences there.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JayMan471 But this really is a trivial objection, b/c there is no convincing explanation for why siblings born further from the1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@hbdchick@JayMan471 the divorce would be more likely to inherit the genes that caused the divorce than their younger siblings.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Scholars_Stage @JayMan471 no. but the point is that you're just making it very difficult to eliminate as much as possible any genetic...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.