@Billare we need words for these groups, don't we?
@Billare ...meant they were ethnically belgian. now ethnic belgians have *lost* their designation. how should i refer to them?
-
-
@hbdchick I am a loss. But is Belgium even a natural division? Aren't there controversies over the Flemish vs. some other group? -
@Billare yes. subgroups. not a problem. just because there are punjabis and karnatakans doesn't mean they're not all indians. -
@hbdchick You aware of the pop-gen results that Continental Euros were basically always admixing so there is not that much stratification -
@Billare and you know that they can practically pinpoint what village people's grandparents came from in europe via genetics. =/ -
@hbdchick I agree. I don't believe those things are contradictory, w/ enough migrants b/w endogamous social units. Lots of movement ofc -
@Billare i think we should still refer to the english as angles, saxons, and jutes. and danes maybe. (~_^) anyway...signing off.... (^_^)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.