@harpersnotes @Ed_Realist @JayMan471 @KirkegaardEmil @hbdchick + model population responses to changes in price/incentives
@pseudoerasmus @harpersnotes @JayMan471 @whyvert yes. i think you're right about that. they'll need to be able to afford those things tho.
-
-
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert but as long as increase in robot-production is gradual, then it is possible for + -
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert + prices to fall faster (raise purchasing power) than worker displacement -
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert@KirkegaardEmil of course that does not apply to case of humans being completely replaceable + -
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert@KirkegaardEmil + that situation can only be addressed by widespread capital ownership -
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert@KirkegaardEmil Actually that may be wrong : owners of capital will not get most benefits of+ -
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert@KirkegaardEmil + robot production, they will (likely) compete away their profits + -
@hbdchick@harpersnotes@JayMan471@whyvert@KirkegaardEmil + biggest beneficiaries will be owners of patents of robotic systems - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.