Wade claims his book has "not been challenged by any serious scientist". Oh really?http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nicholas-wade/five-critics-say-you-shouldnt-read-this-dangerous-book_b_5507633.html?utm_hp_ref=science …
.@JenniferRaff yes, you are misunderstanding me. i was wondering who challenged his recent human evolution premise.
-
-
@hbdchick It's quite interesting--the HBD community has been calling us all creationists lately. Despite that, nobody is saying humans -
@JenniferRaff i haven't. don't be a lumper, jenn. (~_^) -
@hbdchick Fair enough, you haven't. I'm just amused by that :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@hbdchick don't evolve. But his characterization of the research underlying his argument has been repeatedly challenged.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hbdchick For more specifics, I refer you to my reviews. -
@JenniferRaff well your reviews focused mainly on the use of STRUCTURE and whether or not race is something real, iirc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@hbdchick Now I answered your question, please answer mine. Does Wade respect the scientific credentials of his critics? -
@JenniferRaff doesn't look like he respects fuentes' credentials, no. but that's wade's opinion. take it up with him, not me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.