-
-
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@Billare@hbdchick it's all garbled, relationship between population density, resource utilisation and fertility1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@Billare@hbdchick pop.density=bal. of death & birth rates; birth rates mediated by fertility controls, death rates by tech.endowment +2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@Billare@hbdchick in case of china you had both fewer controls on fertility & higher tech sophistication leading to pop. density& thus poor1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@pseudoerasmus@hbdchick I've never been clear on Malthus operationalized, so I'd love to read something like that.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@Billare@hbdchick + malthusian model has 2 inputs only, birth & death rates, that determines everything else +1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@Billare@hbdchick strict malthus, tech. exogenous, but implicit argument http://pseudoerasmus.com/2014/05/15/the-creativity-of-civilisations/ … was pop. density affects technology2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus
@Billare@hbdchick lastly, to the extent "malthusian wringer"="survival of the richest", this has nothing to do with pop.density or poverty+1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@pseudoerasmus @Billare i request a blogpost, too! (^_^) thankuverymuch!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.