.@JenniferRaff (2/2) ...experience what i'm experiencing right now: being called a waaaycist by hysterical people. (or losing your job.)
@JenniferRaff it could, of course, be wrong. needs to be investigated. and i think it should be investigated.
-
-
@hbdchick Fair enough. What evidence would convince you that it's wrong? -
@JenniferRaff you're teh scientists! investigate and share the evidence with the public so we can all know! (^_^) -
@hbdchick But again, when we give you evidence you don't agree with, you say that we're "being political". -
.
@JenniferRaff i'm sorry, jennifer, but *you're* the one who seems to be making assumptions and then just believing them on no basis. -
@hbdchick Apologies-I may have unfairly aggregated you with other replies I'm getting. So you disagree with Wade on this? -
.
@JenniferRaff disagree with wade's *speculation* (theory) that some populations may have experience a sort-of genetic pacification? -
@hbdchick No. This: "The social scientists' official view of race is designated to support the political view that genetics... -
.
@JenniferRaff (2/2) ...always political for those soc scis who don't like genetics as a basis for race idea. for some it is - not majority. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.