.@hbdchick So do you have another, better candidate gene (or genes) for your idea?
-
-
Replying to @JenniferRaff
.
@JenniferRaff not at the moment. but i'm not a geneticst. you are. why don't YOU look for some? prove the theory false.5 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JenniferRaff So any baseless assertion is automatically to be presumed true until shown to be false? Alas...4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alexd_707
.@Alexdurrant7
@JenniferRaff nope. never said that. show me where i've EVER said that. *sheesh*3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JenniferRaff Two, this isn't even a theory, as it explains precisely none of the evidence, and offers no supportable mechanism.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alexd_707
.@Alexdurrant7
@JenniferRaff you still haven't shown me where i've said that any and all assertions should be assumed true. go on.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hbdchick
@hbdchick@JenniferRaff The very notion that 'theories' are to be 'proven' false is grounded on the principle of presumed truth.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Alexdurrant7 @JenniferRaff falsified. i already explained what i meant. tweeting fast 'cause i have a lot of incoming tweets.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.