@hbdchick @Outsideness Seen his stuff before. Interesting, but unnecessary. No reason not to take QM at face value: http://www.askamathematician.com/2010/10/q-copenhagen-or-many-worlds/ …
-
-
-
@JayMan471@hbdchick Surely one prominent reason not to take QM at 'face value' is gravity? QM is incomplete, so of course it points outside -
@Outsideness@hbdchick Indeed. String theory seems the best solution there. Doesn't effect quantum indeterminacy though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.