There's a curious confluence of subscribers to human biodiversity, IQ, cliodynamics, transhumanism, neo-reaction, and the paleo diet. #fb
-
-
Replying to @akarlin88
@akarlin88 Which always strikes me as odd, for I find many of them (#1 and #6 especially, but #4 and everything else as well) to contradict2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@Scholars_Stage I think #1 and #6 are actually very complementary - both are based on applying evolutionary insights to the human animal.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @akarlin88
@akarlin88 I understand that line of thought, but I don't quite buy it. The central idea of HBD is that selection did not end with civiliz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@akarlin88 and that humans have evolved in drastically different ways on the basis of the pressures - environmental and social - each popul1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@akarlin88 ^lation encountered. I cannot imagine a stronger selection pressure than the agrarian diet and lifestyle. If HBD is correct then1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scholars_Stage
@akarlin88 agrarian should have been evo adaptions to survive in a non-paleo world for 10,000 years. Paleo only makes sense if evo stopped4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Scholars_Stage @akarlin88 ...you might not get de-selected. guess i'm saying that agriculture doesn't HAVE to have exerted such strong...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.