Axis should say 1951-1997...pic.twitter.com/Auxqrq1PJ7
Here is a figure that should have been in new Karl et al paper. Pause busting not really that novel anymore:pic.twitter.com/hDGsShfyTD
-
-
-
.
@hausfath Actually, here's the figure that should have been in new Karl paper (I've added in model projections).pic.twitter.com/P6V6H2Ujhm
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@hausfath Haven't read paper. But if you want to test difference, it's best if trend periods don't overlap otherwise based on same data. -
@lucialiljegren the x-axis has a type. Should be 1951-1997 vs. 1998-2014. Data is correct, and I tweeted a fixed version :-) - Show replies
New conversation -
-
New conversation
-
-
-
@hausfath 0.086*(15/62) + x*(47/62) = 0.129, thus: x = (0.129 - .028) * 62/47 = 0.133 fractions are weights by n years in eachThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.