Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
hausfath's profile
Zeke Hausfather
Zeke Hausfather
Zeke Hausfather
@hausfath

Tweets

Zeke Hausfather

@hausfath

Climate scientist working on temp records, climate and energy system models. Director of Climate and Energy @TheBTI. Also: @CarbonBrief, @BerkeleyEarth. He/him.

San Francisco
carbonbrief.org
Joined July 2008

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      Today's criticisms of James Hansen's 1988 projections in @wsjopinion badly miss the mark. While its true that Hansen's "most plausible" Scenario B modestly overestimates recent warming, the reason has nothing to do with the accuracy of Hansen's model. https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up-1529623442 … 1/8pic.twitter.com/eoDNsrhcXx

      14 replies 124 retweets 156 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      Hansen had two tasks to estimate future warming: 1) build a model that accurately captures the physics of the Earth's climate, and 2) predict how emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases will change in the future. The second is a much harder problem than the first! 2/8

      1 reply 2 retweets 26 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      You can have a perfect physical model that will still give you useless predictions if you get future "radiative forcing" from greenhouse gases and aerosols incorrect. While Hansen's Scenario B got CO2 on the nose, it overestimated nearly everything else (via @ClimateOfGavin) 3/8pic.twitter.com/UHj1tVEvHt

      2 replies 3 retweets 23 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      A better test of Hansen's model is to see if the relationship between radiative forcing and temperature matches observations. This removes all the uncertainty involved in predicting future emissions, and just tests the accuracy of the physical model. 4/8

      1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      On this more meaningful metric, Hansen's projections across all his scenarios are very similar to observations; the amount of warming we've seen (~0.45C per w/m^2) is nearly identical to Hansen's projections (0.44C to 0.48C per w/m^2) between 1958 and 2017: 5/8pic.twitter.com/E7nXyeIA9z

      6 replies 50 retweets 99 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      This is even more clear if we compare the trends (the linear relationship between forcing and temperature) between Hansen's model and observations: 6/8pic.twitter.com/U1TgFZosHi

      1 reply 2 retweets 22 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      In an informative RealClimate post today, @ClimateOfGavin estimates how temperatures would have changed over time if Hansen's model used our current best estimate of observed radiative forcing: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2018/06/30-years-after-hansens-testimony/ … 7/8pic.twitter.com/waBeoypy0v

      1 reply 8 retweets 29 likes
      Show this thread
      Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

      In summary, Hansen's model got the relationship between increasing greenhouse gases (and other climate forcings) and global warming dead-accurate. What he didn't get right (and what no one could reasonably expect to get right) is how emissions would change in the future. 8/8

      12:18 PM - 22 Jun 2018
      • 16 Retweets
      • 71 Likes
      • sacha saint-leger 🐝 Peter Mogensen Chris McMahon Jeff Snyder Daniel Haran Donovan Burton Jeff 🏜️ Andreas Schmittner Jeremy Mansfield OAM 🌏
      9 replies 16 retweets 71 likes
        1. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

          @RyanMaue @CatoMichaels FYI ^

          0 replies 2 retweets 23 likes
          Show this thread
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Les Johnson‏ @LesJohnsonHrvat 22 Jun 2018
          Replying to @hausfath

          Yes, Hansen UNDERESTIMATED emissions post 1988. He used 1.5%/year for Scenario A. In reality, emission have outpaced Scenario A by 27%. 1988-2017 they have averaged 1.9%/year. So to say that Scenario B is accurate, misrepresents Hansen's predictions. Both in temps and emissions.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018
          Replying to @LesJohnsonHrvat

          Scenario B had concentrations of 401ppm in 2016 that were pretty close to the 404ppm observed. The climate doesn't care about emissions, just concentrations, and the accuracy of Hansen's rudimentary carbon cycle model is not really relevant...

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Zeke Hausfather‏ @hausfath 22 Jun 2018

          Reto is talking about CMIP5 models, not Hansen's 1988 projections. Observations are well within the envelope of CMIP5 and not inconsistent with the multimodel mean. Over the past 50 years, there is little correlation between model warming and model ECS.pic.twitter.com/Q1JHNLg8HL

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Show replies
        1. G$ Climate Sci‏ @ClimEducator_BG 22 Jun 2018
          Replying to @hausfath

          Thanks this is a pretty stunning graphic display

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. bill davidson  🌍‏ @macdade2 23 Jun 2018
          Replying to @hausfath

          Thanks.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Dana Cayton‏ @Kadok17 5 Jul 2018
          Replying to @hausfath

          he didn't get it right, it's utter crap. The earth has gone through cooling and warming trends for ever, in fact.pic.twitter.com/4gS2Wa93vQ

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Carl Gottstein #maga follow back #mewe #NRA #Frdm‏ @MyTruthStorm 6 Jul 2018
          Replying to @hausfath

          You keep telling yourself that sweetie. That sky is falling and at some point America will hand liberals the power to fix it....HAAAAA!!!!!

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Eric Schroeder‏ @ericlschro 8 Jul 2018
          Replying to @hausfath

          You use RealClimate as a source ? It’s nothing but a propaganda machine. LOL !

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info