Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 21. stu 2019.

    The cherry on top of an inspiring symposium on at : a lecture on why the (computational) humanities matter, by the one and only , the man to whom I dedicated quite a number of footnotes in my thesis. Leiden de gekste!

  2. 8. tra 2019.

    Great to finally have a hardcopy! (Free to download) We from contributed a chapter on making network viz in Gephi accountable

  3. We proudly announce the kick-off of a new blog post series "Digital Tool Criticsm" . The introductory essay is by Vincent Koenig, Human-Computer-Interaction

  4. 11. sij 2019.

    Really cool - our students made a a DNA visualization of their research process by coding collaborative notes in terms of RQ, method, tool, dataset and reflection with Jasmijn van Gorp &

  5. 21. stu 2019.

    Final panel. : Maybe we need to talk “methods” rather than “tools”. This doesn’t solve the problem that a large community of humanities scholars cannot work with raw data.

  6. 21. stu 2019.

    It took us one morning to move away from over digital methods towards digital methodology, with encouraging us to read her 'scholarly crush' James E. Dobson, 'Critical Digital Humanities. The Search for a Methodology'

  7. 3rd CRC conference day starting of vividly & thought-provokingly with Gaia Mosconi on "Three gaps in opening science", one of them pointed out as the 'tools gap'

  8. 7. stu 2018.
    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. Talking about methods instead of tools doesn't solve anything. Moreover, they cannot be equated. A method is more general, whereas the tool is *a particular* manifestation (if at all) of the method. Tool ≠ method, method ≠ tool.

  10. Now up at the symposium is Jasmijn van Gorp associated with on teaching methods - I like the Suchmanian character of the approach

  11. 17. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. on an epistemological note reminds us that Gephi visualizations support notions of filter bubble

  13. 21. stu 2019.

    Thank you and Library for the Tools Criticism symposium , always happy to see libraries facilitating dialog and opening "trading zones"

  14. 21. stu 2019.

    After Tools criticism symposium , thinking that the often used "80/20" trope is becoming short for accounting on the complexity of humanists data skills. Hope there will be more studies that show evidence of this generalization...

  15. 29. svi 2018.

    The problem is plenty of reviewers are also not aware of it, as long as this type of is not built into metholody.

  16. 21. stu 2019.
  17. 7. pro 2019.

    When it comes to tools, be alarmed! The one or other of this interesting analysis could have been reviewed for forthcoming RIDE issues on "Tools and Environments for Digital Scholarly Editing".

  18. 21. stu 2019.

    beautiful color coded research write-ups as a self reflection method for presented by Jasmijn van Gorp at

  19. At the symposium is stating some of the steps and 'ingredients' that facilitate and configure this approach and the related practices

  20. Very important topic and one of our main issues: - because the use of methods needs also profound theoretical reflections

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.