Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 7 sati

    The elephant in the room: Are suitable homes for the world's largest land mammals?..recent deaths of elephants at a San Diego facility in US, again raises a controversial question..what is gained by keeping them in captivity?

  2. prije 18 sati

    Jon is also the latest "Notable " to be added to the Wikipedia entry. He has a naturalistic, non-religious worldview and grants moral consideration to sentient beings (e.g. not eating them). Who else needs adding?

  3. 2. velj

    Why believe things for which there is no evidence? Why care about some beings that can suffer and not others?

  4. 2. velj

    Now I consider myself a I also consider myself an and but its a fuck up situation on both ends. And sadly most of this also all comes from white only perspective. An a western only perspective.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  5. 31. sij

    'Flags are bits of coloured cloth that governments first use to 'shrink-wrap' peoples minds, then as ceremonial shrouds to bury the dead'...

  6. 31. sij

    A piece on some of the other implications of : "What disappears in a world?" Thanks to our sentientism community for their ideas:

    Prikaži ovu nit
  7. 31. sij

    ~ and ~ might be the most obvious implications of , but they're not its core. The foundation of is a commitment to evidence and reason. That's where the ~ and ~ come from. Much more too.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. 30. sij

    has serious, radical implications for animals and humans. But its most important commitment is to evidence and reason. All the flow from that. Read / listen: Community: Intro:

  9. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    You might be interested in an episode on . A simple, potentially unifying worldview: 1⃣ Evidence + reason (like secular humanism) 2⃣ Moral consideration for all sentient beings Intro piece here if of interest: +

  10. 30. sij

    Ridicule follows those who stand for something which is not mainstream...but how does anything change, without challenging what is?

  11. 29. sij
  12. 29. sij
  13. 29. sij

    I've now been on two podcasts! , , , , , + getting assaulted by white nationalists (language warning!) (thanks ) (thanks ) Feedback (even brutal) welcome.

  14. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Interested in why you don't see a moral negative in chicken suffering/death, Philip. From a philosophy perspective (amateur) you might find an interesting angle. I had this published as an intro: . Interesting link to too...?

  15. 29. sij

    This article shared in Beyond Animal is a deep dive into the concept of "integration of human and animal rights to create sentient rights".

  16. 29. sij

    The real challenge is to work out where you are gullible, not just where others are gullible. As with many humanists and atheists, I’d suggest you think hard about animal ethics and animal farming. A blind spot for so many.

  17. 28. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Great talk - thank you all. Sentience is fascinating and also critical ethically. I had this published re: why sentience is so important, morally: More + if of interest. Group:

  18. 28. sij
  19. 27. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Great to talk to you Stephen - interested to hear what people think of (Evidence, reason + compassion for all sentient beings). To find out more: + a friendly, global community here too (54 countries) - all welcome:

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.