Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Odgovor korisnicima

    It appears we have something missing on how to stop this coup. What agency, what powers? You would think the would have power....no one can literally stop this buillshit. We have much to change in the next congress.

  2. Texas v. U.S. is the case challenging the ACA’s minimum essential coverage provision (aka the individual mandate). It's known as Calif. v. Texas in Our explainer answers key questions about the case:

  3. prije 8 minuta
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Hey did u happen to mention to ? Where was her concern for & scorched Judiciary when was pissing on the Constitution & rule of law then? have been killing America(n) ideals for years

  4. prije 9 minuta

    Yes, it appears that the Supreme Court of the United States of America makes fidget-spinner memorabilia. .

  5. prije 31 minutu

    This is all on you in that and are complicit in his crimes and are allowing and perpetuating them as well as this horrendous cover up!!!

  6. If presidential electors are allowed to use their independent judgment, voters will have to know who they are and what they intend on doing. The horror.

  7. Why am I bored? Oh right, is on another holiday.

  8. prije 47 minuta

    Never forget that the senate also stole a seat because it was an election year...

  9. Odgovor korisnicima

    Sen , your job is to uphold your of ; if your called for , then that’s how you should have voted. It’s not your call to project what it might have meant for ! That’s job. Lead, don’t hide!💔🇺🇸💙

  10. there remains a very teeny tiny ever-narrowing window otherwise, enjoy prison! DT is SO EMBOLDENED now, w support of , + that U'll be trashed n thrashed by FOX + MAGAts who 1ce EMBRACED U, faster than u can say "sleazebag, human scum."

  11. prije 1 sat
  12. . : Given that could be terminated by in just a few months, Dreamers like María who add so much value to our communities could be vulnerable to deportation. I stand in solidarity with our Dreamers and DACA recipients...

    Prikaži ovu nit
  13. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    used to be where individuals & marginalized groups could get justice. It was the only hope for overriding discriminatory legislation. & their activist judges have stopped that. From voting rights to corporations being "people", SCOTUS has set the country back

  14. prije 1 sat

    That was before Justice Kennedy resigned his seat for personal gain and was replaced by radical right wingnut Kavanaugh. It’s a whole new ballgame on which bodes ill for women and minorities.

  15. prije 1 sat

    You could not be more ignorant accusing a of siding with the Republicans! YOU POCAHONTAS & other Candidates SHOULD NOT EVEN BE ELIGIBLE to vote for anything when it's YOUR OPPONENT who BTW will KICK ASS come November 2020! Pathetic Idiot!

  16. Odgovor korisnicima

    Those judgeships were left open deliberately so that could load them all with liberal judges. The deal was that #44 would also be appointed to the . Makes sense, right?

  17. prije 1 sat

    doesn't matter how much $$ is poured into your reelection via sweetheart deals, the people of Maine won't forget , , & now . Campaign Is Being Helped by a Mysterious Hawaii Company via

  18. prije 1 sat

    Several Supreme Court justices are registered members of political parties, raising questions about appearances at a time when the justices’ associations are under scrutiny, according to the nonpartisan judicial watchdog group Fix the Court.

  19. prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Cross check every cellphone&EZ pass with Every shooting since Impeached45 took WH. let him! Knowing he rigged it! Knowing 🇷🇺helped& knowing COULD have Sued&Paused POTUS powers Until . Now- SCOTUS is political ⭕️ jerk

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.