-
"Any legislator can prattle on about...California’s housing crisis. But how many have the courage to do something about it?" Now's the time to say YES to
#SB50, YES to more housing, and YES to a future where people can afford to call California home! https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/Editorial-A-vote-against-SB50-is-a-vote-for-15011922.php … -
As we wait for word on
#SB50, let's just reflect upon the fact that every single one of California's senators is a homeowner. Fewer than 50% of Californians own their homes. -
Watching the
#SB50 vote come down to the wire, it’s easy to forget that Gov.@GavinNewsom ran on building millions of homes. Would be really cool if he could show even an iota of leadership right now. -
Editorial: A vote against SB50 is a vote for California’s housing and homelessness crisis
#SB50 https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/Editorial-A-vote-against-SB50-is-a-vote-for-15011922.php … -
The big takeaway from the
#SB50 vote? Despite high-profile opposition from tenants groups, it was senators from affluent suburbs that killed it. My post-mortem here: https://legal-planet.org/2020/01/30/breaking-sb-50-voted-down-by-state-senators-representing-affluent-suburbs/ … -
The
#SB50 is very odd to me. Its essentially a debate about whether areas near jobs and transit should allow only single-family homes or not. What are the affordability requirements for single-family homes? None.Prikaži ovu nit -
I’m extremely disappointed in my senator,
@BenAllenCA voting against#SB50. We desperately need massive amounts of new housing, but if we let the desires of rich, white homeowners outweigh the common good, it will never happen. -
As a co-author of
#SB50, I'm incredibly frustrated—as are many of you—that it failed today. We *MUST* pull out all the stops to build new homes if we want to stabilize housing costs & end our homelessness crisis. Status quo inaction is *not* an option.https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-s-SB50-denser-housing-bill-is-dead-15017203.php …Prikaži ovu nit -
Let's not slip too far away from the main issue with
#sb50. It's a decision on whether or not we want to have it be illegal to build four story apartment buildings next to buses. Two-thirds of Californians think we should legalize apartments.Prikaži ovu nit -
In the two years since SB827 was introduced I've paid $72,000 in rent. My landlords (plural because we were evicted once so that the guy could cash out) have paid a total of $7,353 in property taxes and maybe a few hundred dollars in maintenance.
#SB50 -
#SB50 is trending because of the vote and it's causing football fans to interact with YIMBY folk in a very confusing discussion of the 2016 Super BowlPrikaži ovu nit -
I voted for
@GavinNewsom for one reason, and one reason only, because I expected ACTION on his promises to get millions of homes built, not spineless dithering Gavin, you still have time to do the right thing, step up, twist arms, and get#SB50 passed
https://twitter.com/dillonliam/status/1222691657323180032 … -
Califronia’s
#SB50, which would dramatically increase density around transit and job centers, has fallen short for the third year in a row. My piece with@TarynLunahttps://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-29/high-profile-california-housing-bill-to-allow-mid-rise-apartments-near-transit-falls-short …Prikaži ovu nit -
By not passing
#sb50 today, CA has guaranteed the only people who will be buying homes near jobs are highly paid techies, executives, and people with existing wealth. Judge politicians by the outcomes of their votes on bills, not their speeches, and not who they pander to.Prikaži ovu nit -
It's hard for me to believe the controversy over
#SB50. All it does is make it legal to build apartments. We really need to expend so much brain energy on something so simple, so obvious? We need to debate whether housing will be more or less expensive if we allow apartments? -
In the two years since SB827 was introduced, my partner and I have paid $62,000 in rent. Our landlord has paid a total of $5,362 in property taxes plus $175 for the one time a plumber came (I had to call the plumber.) We need
#SB50! Our economy is getting eaten by landowners. https://twitter.com/rycpt/status/1222689548246773760 … -
Incredibly,
@HenrySternCA is invoking the climate crisis on the Senate floor right now as a reason to oppose#SB50, a bill supported by@FossilFreeCA, the@NRDC and Environment California. Congrats, dude: you're the new face of liberal climate denialism.
-
Apt headline pairing today from the
@sfchronicle.#SB50 pic.twitter.com/NMiwQYdpey
-
Every senator voting or abstaining against
#SB50 while claiming to support renters is a coward. As an organizer, I would like to be the first to thank you all for radicalizing a new batch of YIMBYs to vote your asses out of office. -
Threw a quick map together of today's
#SB50 vote: pic.twitter.com/VDUHxFYE3X
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.