Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 29. sij

    "Any legislator can prattle on about...California’s housing crisis. But how many have the courage to do something about it?" Now's the time to say YES to , YES to more housing, and YES to a future where people can afford to call California home!

  2. Editorial: A vote against SB50 is a vote for California’s housing and homelessness crisis

  3. 30. sij

    As a co-author of , I'm incredibly frustrated—as are many of you—that it failed today. We *MUST* pull out all the stops to build new homes if we want to stabilize housing costs & end our homelessness crisis. Status quo inaction is *not* an option.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. The defeat of is a victory for segregationists and climate denial. Tenant advocacy groups did not kill the bill, the homeowner lobby did. The solutions to our housing crisis lie in robust tenant protections and dramatic densification — yes, BOTH.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  5. What happened with California’s , why did it die and what’s up with the governor’s pledge to support lots more housing now? Find out in less than 25 minutes on the latest

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. prije 5 sati

    CAREALTORS: RT CARgovaffairs: .latimes is right, is the answer. Now is the time to solve CA's housing crisis with the only meaningful solution: MORE HOMES.

  7. prije 13 sati

    Enjoy your drive to work this morning. Suburban sprawl wins again in the battle against CA’s .

  8. Prikaži ovu nit
  9. 31. sij
  10. 31. sij

    ICYMI: Wiener’s controversial housing bill dies for third consecutive year

  11. 31. sij

    I hear there are other versions of the bill up ’s sleeve 👀 Wiener’s Controversial SB-50 Housing Bill Dies for Third Consecutive Year

  12. 31. sij

    If plastic straws up and disappeared from the face of the earth, it still won't reduce carbon emissions as much as connecting housing + transit will be. We need this bill. Holding out hope for and to get a victory this week

  13. 31. sij

    Me and ’s final cut on the failure of today with some new tidbits about the governor’s role and how the bill’s demise affects his promises to boost housing production in California

  14. As a newer resident of CA, the NIMBYism makes me feel unwelcome, and as an economist, it drives me CRAZY that we do not increase supply to deal with the insane price of housing. Thanks for fighting the good fight,

  15. 30. sij

    I'm beyond frustrated and disappointed with those senators who abstained or voted no on . Most acknowledge our severe housing crisis and say that action must be taken, yet here we are again.

  16. 30. sij

    Lack of affordable housing increases poverty, homelessness and costs for everyone. SHAME on for siding with NIMBYs and voting against , the one bill that would dramatically expand the housing supply while increasing use of mass transit!

  17. The high-profile California housing bill failed to get enough votes to move on to the assembly, even after more than a year of negotiations and debate that extended into the final hour. Lawmakers vowed, though, that this is not the end. My story:

  18. Unaffordable California is here to stay thanks to our state politicians. was a weak bill that wouldn’t have done much, but politicians know best: it’s better to have unaffordable homes than duplexes and triplexes near transit.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.