Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 1. velj

    In the past week people have correctly expressed concern over the twitter piling-on re . I want to share a few thoughts about whether twitter is a suitable place for this to play out... [thread]

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. Very disturbing… Half of the top 10 who have racked up the most on 's list are Japanese. Yet only about 5% of published comes from . Why are there so many Japanese fraudsters?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. 13. kol 2019.

    Is there a reasonable way to modify indicators like h-index or to take into account? Yes, claim the authors of a recent paper

  4. 2. velj

    On collaborations, data-checking, and . Very well-written . Mad respect! You're an inspiration.

  5. 2. velj
  6. 31. sij

    A Nobel Laureate Retracted Her High-Profile Paper. Bravo!

  7. 31. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. 31. sij

    Are you citing a retracted piece? Better check the latest! Watch Leaderboard via

  9. 31. sij

    "if we stigmatize retractions, we will see fewer of them and the scientific record will retain its errors longer than we'd like". Great blog by re recent . It may be destressing but it shouldn't be a witch hunt.

  10. 2. sij

    An institutional review recommended retraction of certain works by an author who has since died. The publisher is reviewing the articles identified for . Should they also review the other articles written by the author? Case with advice:

  11. 19. pro 2019.

    As an editor, what should I include in a retraction notice? Read COPE's Retraction Guidelines to find out more.

  12. 3. stu 2019.

    Harms of retracted research, when systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines do not update to remove retracted research. Important new paper in

  13. 👎 2 retractions in an hour❗️ 😳 💥💥💥what happens when the number of your outnumbers your viewers⁉️😂😂😂🤣 You turn into 🎃

  14. Motherboard Researchers Retract Study That Said Fake News Is Just as Likely to Go Viral as the Truth Via

  15. 28. pro 2018.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    If this is true, it was the mistake husband’s idea, not Meghan’s. The new Duchess isn’t bothered by the “noise”, but I guarantee you engelson and his new wife are. 😂 coming soon. LA

  16. 27. pro 2018.

    «Science is a powerful self-correcting machine» - While are the ‘nuclear option’ in scholarly publishing, they’re really a sign that science is operating as advertised: Finding, reporting, correcting errors.

  17. 23. pro 2018.

    Ein wenig erinnern die Erfindungen des Spiegel-Reporters auch an die Paper-Manipulationen rund um den Pflanzenforscher Olivier mit 8 und knapp 20 Corrections. Journalistische und wissenschaftliche Ethik haben wohl durchaus einiges gemeinsam.

  18. 25. ruj 2018.

    Great talk by at on and ! To anyone interested in machine-readable retraction data, check out WikiProject Retractions from 👇

  19. 5. ruj 2018.

    Good work, & , moving info from behind a robots.txt politeness-wall.

  20. 4. ruj 2018.

    Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded of and corrections Also check the taxonomy used in the database

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.