Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 8 sati

    Continue... 'It had failed, but instead of changing the theory astrophysicists worked out with computers what complex distribution of invisible matter was needed to make GR work and went to look for it.'

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    That's very sad. Anyone with a good understanding of physics cannot fail to be interested in and everything it implies including the ability to do away with the dark matter kludge. Keeping an open mind, whilst ignoring the quacks, is hard though. I get it.

  3. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Yes, you have heard of it. You criticised (MiHsC) in 2016 & I wrote a blog in response to you:

  4. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    when the hell are they going to incorporate into the standard model?

  5. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Could this be somewhat explained with ?

  6. 27. sij

    This is a paper I wrote with J. Gine in 2017 that derives (& gets rid of ) to within 8% by assuming that mass-energy comes from information loss. Time to try again & close the last 8%: (journal) (pdf)

  7. 25. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
  8. 25. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    suggests new ways to generate energy, some if which have been glimpsed:

  9. 20. sij

    Sir Martin Rees : I highly recommend you invite to Cambridge to discuss or present to his peers. Prof Mike McCulloch

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. 20. sij

    ? Please have someone review and Prof work . His theory, , is having global impact on the world of physics esp

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 19. sij

    “Aliens man... aliens”. Quantized Inertia - Hypothesis Explaining the Universe Or Pseudoscience? via

  12. 6. pro 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Look no further , because claims that his theory of can make a a possibility. DARPA already funds him to test his theory.

  13. 15. stu 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Both ways up will likely show weight reduction, owing to the buoyancy force change being larger than the QI force change. But the difference between the two changes should be roughly zero if there's no effect. And twice the actual QI force generated otherwise.

  14. 1. stu 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    I read the SETI bit and my theory on why we don't see is that power can be harvested from vacuum energy via the mass effect. The harvested power could hide anything except anomalous extra 'dark' mass. Most is solved with , but all?

  15. 31. lis 2019.

    The acceleration of the whole cosmos is cH (speed of light times the Hubble constant). Also, the acceleration below which galaxies, globular clusters & wide binaries (most stuff) starts to obey different physics is ~cH. Only explains why. Ignore it, & miss out.

  16. So we need to ask the question : Regarding Hypothesis by , has anyone found a case which disproves it?

  17. 24. lis 2019.

    If u can predict something ahead of time, then u have good science (eg ). If you have to look first & fiddle around (eg ) then u don't.

  18. 18. lis 2019.

    This plot should be shown 2 every astrophysicist. It shows wide binary stars orbit each other too fast in exactly the same way as galaxies. can't be used on these scales so it is falsified. MoND also fails. Only works. Source:

  19. 26. ruj 2019.

    This experiment makes me wonder if there might be a sonic equivalent to radiation that might be amenable to experiment. Worth thinking about for , ?

  20. I recommend best math students try to find experiment which disproves hypothesis in true Popper style . Whether is a breakthough or not, the collection of anomalies that explains is very interesting to hundreds of scientists.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.