Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Just got rejected from a top journal because our findings aren't surprising enough. "Are there any counterintuitive or unexpected findings that the authors could highlight more? If not, the paper feels like it's a documentation of things we would already expect."

  2. prije 14 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Yes, thanks. If they weren't dehumanized, it would be even cooler but I'm not sure the data would have made it to publication (and to the Guardian)!

  3. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Agree! There are many full professors who have never in their career published negative results. ?

  4. 31. sij

    I just came across the Wiley "Step by step guide to reviewing a manuscript" They state that "Statistically non-significant variations" are a major flaw in a paper?! Guide here:

  5. 31. sij
  6. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Habe ich das behauptet? Aber jetzt wo sie es ansprechen könnte ich mir vorstellen, dass der geringer ist, weil die Studien zumindest für nicht vom Hersteller durchgeführt werden.

  7. from presents a project relating to the of studies. More & more studies are being registered but there is room for improvement!

  8. 27. sij
  9. 27. sij

    Bad news for meta-analyses: Comparing 15 meta-analyses to multi-lab replication attempts of the same effects, on average, meta-analytic effect sizes are almost three times as large as replication effect sizes.

  10. 15. sij

    The new format offered by will reduces and improve . It will allow researchers to get feedback and address potential design flaws before running the experiment, and be guaranteed a publication regardless of the results.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 🙀 It's already a year since my favorite chapter of the PhD thesis went out in 🥳: 'Meta-analysis challenges a textbook example of status signalling and demonstrates publication bias' ⌛️ Time flies 🐦

  12. 5. stu 2019.

    My next lecture will be about , and . I just uploaded the slides: . There's not too much information, the main part will be a hands-on exercise, where students need to get a significant result out of a dataset I simulated.

  13. 30. lis 2019.

    Yes but why is there so little high quality evidence re medicinal cannabis used (in this case) for mental health? Elephant in the room here is that for decades it was almost impossible to get ethics approval + funding + therapeutic quality cannabis for research.

  14. Highlight negative results to improve science "it's scientists who report negative results who are more likely to move a field forward"

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. “That is science.” I have ordered this amazing cartoon as a framed print for my office wall —for laughs & to remind me that negative results are still science. I am often wrong. And it’s not science’s fault. ☢️🧠⚛️🧬

  16. 1. srp 2019.

    Need a brief explanation of for a class? This is a great TED talk by on publication bias, including pretty shocking examples of psychology & medicine. Pertains to current debates about replicability & reproducibility.

  17. 23. tra 2019.

    I was hoping we had moved past rejecting papers because they only show ‘modest’ or ‘small’ effects. Perhaps I’m living in a bubble!

  18. 19. ožu 2019.

    Complex filter retrieval is not benign 🤕 ...Come check out my talk on Complex IVC filter retrieval techniques and management of complications at (sneak preview of some cases to be presented)

  19. 17. stu 2018.

    This is 's favourite funnel plot! Smaller studies exaggerate the effectiveness of treatment.

  20. 24. ruj 2018.

    Congratulations. Your Study Went Nowhere. via An article describing and in . Will open more eyes...

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.