Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 18. srp 2016.

    That moment when you live in Atlantic Canada and read the "Congrats to the recipients!" email

  2. 15. srp 2016.

    Today I'm very sad about all the great scientists who got screwed across the country. Sad day for Canadian science.

  3. 19. srp 2016.

    : lowst % fundng in CIHR history+unqualified rvwrs+flawed rvw process, while cmnty strved. Same ppl still in charge. Expect change?

  4. 16. srp 2016.

    I simply cannot believe the stories coming from results - how can reviewers not get that health research includes basic science?

  5. 15. srp 2016.

    Congrats to the few fantastic colleagues who have managed to get funded despite the madness!

  6. 15. srp 2016.

    Well if you're going refresh a website every 15' all day, may as well have a view like this.

  7. 1. kol 2016.

    Only 1 Cognitive Neuroscience grant funded in Canada. Can a scientific field apply for protection as an "endangered species"?

  8. 18. srp 2016.

    Here are some of these frustrating comments on my project related to neurobiology of obesity

  9. 15. srp 2016.

    WeII I somehow won the CIHR lottery. Hard to feel good about it with the way things went down and seeing the poor quality reviews

  10. 20. srp 2016.

    anyone else feeling like this?

  11. 15. srp 2016.

    A virtually-no-review received by colleague.Not funded-but no weakness Easy to improve based on comments

  12. Thinking of all the amazing Canadian health researchers today (funded & unfunded). Hoping we find a way to continue our good work

  13. 16. srp 2016.

    Are the rich just getting richer through current investigator-driven competitions?

  14. 15. srp 2016.

    To all my colleagues awaiting results, may the odds be ever in your favour

  15. 15. srp 2016.

    Commencing the refresh cycle. CIHR will need time to strip referee names from 4000 files as they apparently can't program.

  16. At least when I'll apply to the next competition I'll be a year older

  17. 15. srp 2016.

    See a distribution like that in the lab? You'd call it uninterpretable and repeat/redesign the experiment

  18. 15. srp 2016.

    To all the and applicants, I raise a toast to you today for your awesome research. Canada has some incredible researchers.

  19. 21. lip 2016.

    I hope that the dismal participation in virtual review will spur changes for the next round of

  20. 20. ruj 2016.

    Can we all agree to start our grants with these lines?

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.