-
Reviewing
#preprints cannot be easier. In seconds you can install#OSrPRE in your browser https://outbreaksci.prereview.org/extension or work directly on the platform. It's open and it's free.@outbreaksci@PREreview_#2019nCoV@biorxivpreprinthttps://twitter.com/ryneches/status/1223439143503482880 …
-
I agree with the piece. The quick retraction of the "uncanny"
#coronavirus paper shows that peer review on#preprints works, in fact in my view much better than the current system based on 2-3 anonymous peer-reviewers prior to publication https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/03/retraction-faulty-coronavirus-paper-good-moment-for-science/ …Prikaži ovu nit -
Disseminating this type of analysis broadly as
#2019nCoV#coronavirus spreads represents a huge benefit of#preprints! Even if it isn't peer-reviewed, it is better to be able to critically evaluate this information moving forward than not to have it. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.20019844v1 …Prikaži ovu nit -
This! Read it! Amazing how
#preprints can make a difference ! https://twitter.com/k_g_andersen/status/1223747921809592320 … -
More comments/commenters on
#preprints, please. Would very much help reporters trying to cover one (or, equally important, explaining to editors why we don't think that's a good idea). https://twitter.com/GaetanBurgio/status/1224454229076533248 … -
seems like some scientists are taking advantage of nCov2019 outbreak and flooding
#bioRxiv with#preprints.#bioRxiv has to display a notification on their website.pic.twitter.com/IXYsyYtnDY
-
Yes, they have not yet been peer reviewed, but you all researchers in the field can
#PeerReview these#preprints both rapidly on https://outbreaksci.prereview.org#OSrPRE or more extensively on https://PREreview.org .@outbreaksci#2019nCoVhttps://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/1223598414493077505 …
-
Check out the comments on
@biorxivpreprint to the paper https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1 … We should RT these, encourage influential commenters to tweet themselves and drown out#2019nCoV#misinformation maybe@BrianHanley1@GaetanBurgio@surt_lab@EpiEllie@cshperspectives#preprints https://twitter.com/firefoxx66/status/1223511520375721985 … -
Time to publication for
#preprints shown to be 19 days faster than non-preprinted research: http://bit.ly/36sz1mV -
Don't forget before further proceedings with
#preprints that they are not peer reviewed, though the#scientific community deserves huge respect for putting their immediate contributions in public health concern.https://twitter.com/JohnRInglis/status/1223598414493077505 …
-
Based on the scientific community's collective response to a recent preprint on
#coronavirus, we now see the true value of#preprints - "fostering scientific communication and rapid awareness of others’ work" https://www.statnews.com/2020/01/31/preprints-fill-void-rapidly-changing-science/ … -
Oops: Study claiming
#nCoV2019 can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed,@kakape tells us: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/paper-non-symptomatic-patient-transmitting-coronavirus-wrong … It's not just#preprints; research is moving almost as fast as the#coronavirus -
5 Scholarly Publishing Trends to Watch in 2020: https://bit.ly/35L86Ct
#openaccess#preprints#scholcomm -
Welp, someone certainly has a problem with folx who support
#OpenScience &#preprints during the current epi/pandemic: pic.twitter.com/xpTMPqlRkS
-
And welcome to
#preprints!
-
The
#2019nCoV preprint on@biorxivpreprint shows the value of#preprints not the weakness. There was rapid dialogue, feedback and authors listened. It was open and transparent exchange. Not all Pre prints (or eve peer reviewed articles) are strong. They should spark discussion. -
Coming late onto Twitter: For i in x: {
#Preprints bad coz spread misinformation -> Twitter bad because spreads bad info -> Preprints good coz immediate and extensive review -> Twitter good coz bad info heavily criticized } Print x I'm still digesting the point of preprints.Prikaži ovu nit -
One good thing about
#preprints is that they are lower stakes, so it's easier for authors to take criticism & withdraw if necessary. https://twitter.com/cshperspectives/status/1223689222667804673 …
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

, if you're interested in learning more about 