Search results
  1. Jan 2

    Dear , We didn't elect a to continue GOP austerity that undercuts progressive policy. You are supposed to be progressives. We need you to be progressive in your votes, not just your campaign words. Vote NO on the rules package that includes .

  2. Jan 1
  3. Jan 2

    As it turns out, to get nice things like a , Medicare for All, or Social Security expansion, we need to invest serious money. severely limits Congress's ability to move forward these crucial programs. Thank you, for being outspoken NO on PAY-GO.

  4. Jan 2

    The rule proposed by is a self-imposed, unecccesary obstacle to stopping climate change & enacting a .

  5. Jan 1

    Correction: are most definite “no” votes, would leave 11 more DEMs to join them for a victory. If anything will make me leave this party is if Pelosi kills progressive legislation with .

  6. Jan 2

    If is such a “master legislator,” why do Dems have to pass that kneecaps themselves as first order of business? Did the pass where they didn’t pass tax cuts unless they could pay for it? Of course not, why would they punch themselves in the face?

  7. Jan 3

    Seriously, AOC is NOT playing. She will vote a resounding NO on and I am raising my monthly donation to her, although I'm a granny on fixed income. People who fight for us in Congress are just too damn rare!

  8. in simple terms: Means the government must demonstrate that it will *subtract* a 💵 from the economy for every 💵 it intends to *add*. Why on 🌎 would we want a rule to prohibit *net* 💵 contributions to the economy?

    Show this thread
  9. Jan 3

    is a disastrous policy for any major progressive policies. Retweet this post to spread awareness about this sneaky establishment trick to keep important legislation from passing. And tell your Congressman to vote NO on PAYGO. More on PayGo here:

  10. Yesterday we started a convo w/ the rules pkg about ending , a political policy lacking economic merit that sabotages progress where Americans value it most: healthcare, education, housing, & more. Today I’m proud to cosponsor legislation w/ to end it.

  11. Jan 2
    Show this thread
  12. Jan 2

    HUGE. It's right for all House members to fight to block -- unless they're working for Wall Street, billionaires and huge multinational corporations.

  13. Jan 2

    If Democrats are serious about walking the walk on and Medicare for All, they will say NO to . , looking at you badass, smart women to show leadership off the bat. 💪🏽

  14. Jan 2

    single-handedly kills Medicare for All, College for All, and The Green New Deal, and is further evidence that Establishment Democrats don't care about progressive values. live now on TYT.

  15. Jan 2

    Corporate dems are desperate to prevent a floor vote on Medicare for All. is a Paul Ryan-esque austerity rule that would give them a procedural reason to avoid debating M4A. Tell your reps we're done listening to excuses. We want them to vote No on this rules package!

  16. Jan 3

    If you vote for you are economically illiterate, politically dense, or both. To all CA House – don't you ever use to describe yourself if you vote for (I'm looking directly at you @NancyPelosi).

    Show this thread
  17. Jan 1

    In order for to go into effect, it needs to pass the House. If some 18 Dems vote no, it fails. The vote will take place on Thursday. Will enough progressives have the courage to vote no on the first roadblock to , & ? Let's see.

  18. Jan 1

    I'll be watching how my rep, , votes on this. is atrocious.

  19. Jan 2

    If is going to wave for progressive priorities, why have the rule at all? Why is she fighting hard for it? No, she'll use it politically against progressives. Voting yes puts it on your record forever. & should fight for us now. Vote No!

  20. Jan 2

    I will be voting NO on the Rules package with . It is terrible economics. The austerians were wrong about the Great Recession and Great Depression. At some point, politicians need to learn from mistakes and read economic history.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.