Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 1 sat
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    bad choice : in the general-contrasting-points-of-view Schrödinger identifies how integer, inverse squaring works ("in favor of good predictions as accurate measurements of power'); "the particularly exigent demand is the square root" --What Is Life?

  2. prije 5 sati

    Thinking about - Are appeals to intrinsic properties, like appealing to essences, an analytic distinction that needs to be cashed out with explanatory not just formal value (e.g. simplicity, elegance, etc?)? 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. prije 6 sati
  4. prije 7 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    if this is consistent with that by

  5. prije 15 sati

    On my way to London to examine a PhD on 'Modal Rationalism & the Metaphysics of Mind' before addressing the on 'Panpsychism & Free Will.'

  6. prije 22 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I don't think I've ever read a book that didn't make some kind of reference to opposite directions as defined in English dictionaries (by willfully avoiding collisions). I didnt mean to suggest anything wrong with the book I haven't read it but like in

  7. 3. velj

    But we don't know how life emerged from the processes set off by the . Evolutionary theory has not found how life began or where the border with the inanimate was crossed. Nor can explain how conscious elementary particles emerged or evolved from the .

  8. 2. velj

    That's question-begging against . Why do you assume that consciousness didn't exist at the Big Bang, as the intrinsic nature of fundamental entities (whatever they are)?

  9. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Neither matter nor nor atoms nor life existed at the . They evolved and emerged as the universe cooled and was sculpted by . So is as completely dependent on emergence as materialism and neither hypothesis proposes any mechanism for it.

  10. 2. velj

    An excellent refutation of by . At the , neither atoms, life, nor existed, yet all evolved or emerged as the universe developed. We don't have the mechanism, but needs as much as physicalism.

  11. 1. velj

    Considering the increasingly popular, but crazy sounding, idea that everything in the universe is conscious.

  12. 1. velj
  13. 1. velj

    but is not accurate in its appeal to Occam's logic as is accurately but inconsistently suggested as in (as considered between "additional observations" as plain sight, hearing, reading, feeling, SEEKING nonfiction and fiction

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. 1. velj

    Western thought has held only humans can think, but Indigenous peoples believe (know) that non-human nature is sentient.

  15. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    As a non-native english, I use google automatic subtitles to help, but it seems to meet a "hard problem" with the word panpsychism ^^ . Anyway, thanks to feed our minds

  16. 31. sij

    Looking forward to talking about & in London on Monday.

  17. 30. sij

    Just a thought... If consciousness does not exist, how is it that you take yourself so seriously?

  18. 29. sij

    Excited Christof Koch agreed to do an interview for the pod & my project at . Here’s a cool lecture he did if you are interested.

  19. 29. sij

    Something arising from nothing is impossible as it violates the law of conservation of energy. Thought involves work and therefore requires energy. Think about it.

  20. 28. sij

    Plants 🌱 murdered on a vegan diet, everything connected, everything concious. Energy exchanged, choose your source. Food for thought 💭

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.