Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 53 minute

    at the current rate of warming within a few years there will be no place on to live, but plenty of places to die,

  2. prije 59 minuta
  3. prije 1 sat
  4. prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    It's far more likely that people in developing countries will actually strive for increased living standards, & with it all the extra consumption. is a disaster for this planet & I'd reiterate other comments... powerful, influential ppl are cowards for ignoring it

  5. prije 2 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    1/2 is a HUGE problem. To suggest otherwise is folly. I'm a fan George but you can't seriously discount the massively negative effects inherent to 8 billion plus ppl. You want mass but population is the single biggest driver of habitat destruction.

  6. prije 3 sata

    Yes, consumption by rich nations is a major issue to address not just , but every other environmental issue on Earth. But you cannot ignore the even more critical factor of .

  7. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Thanks for speaking up about

  8. prije 4 sata
  9. prije 4 sata
  10. Odgovor korisnicima

    Thank you for speaking up about

  11. Only by showing how many of us there are, and that we are regular people with no sinister motives, will we break the taboo around

    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. prije 6 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    For a party calling itself Green, it undermines my faith in their purpose when they cannot be honest about and are kicking this can down the street. All contributions are magnified by & solutions are not election winning platforms

  13. If you acknowledge overpopulation as a serious global threat, I encourage you to add the hashtag to your username or profile

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. And I remained convinced that is one of the top problems in our world. All the sustainable living in the world won't make a lick of difference with human population in the billions and careening towards 11 billion via

  15. Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    The have always addressed , why are they silent on the problem now, when it is more relevant than ever?

  16. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I completely agree. I think we're seeing all this push back because all over the world it is becoming obvious that is a serious problem but these people don't want to accept it. So they're arguing louder than ever to not have to accept it

  17. prije 8 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    They are not declining. A miracle if they were. They are only slowing in their growth & there is no end in sight for that growth. It will only stop when we reach the limits of the planet & will be controlled with mass starvation. We are being inhuman by allowing

  18. prije 9 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Peace prize for enciting anarchy & discord. Now that’s a new one. If she solved & poverty than yes. The nomination alone is a bit of a joke. Jane Goodall has dedicated her life she deserves one not some kid.

  19. prije 9 sati

    But we are looking to create 2 billion more & that’s 10 billion more tons of CO2 per year matters

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.