Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    to commit Fraud against America!! There ALL In The Loop.

  2. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Big difference between a judge ruling on admissible evidence and a majority of the jurors voting no to evidence.

  3. Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    No witnesses, no documents.

  4. It's at all.

  5. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Didn't see it, intentionally. Didn't expect nothing but, Conspiracy Propaganda help by FOX. I hear thats abt it.

  6. 30. sij
  7. 30. sij

    Here are my senators signing the oath book to be fair and impartial. So much for that. no witnesses

  8. 3. velj

    I wish the press and newscasters would call it a “get together” and not a trial. Trials have witnesses.

  9. Grifters.

  10. 3. velj

    When you can't defend on facts: The legal team for the has turned to drama. No matter how dramatic Sekulow gets it doesn't change the fact tha DJT, bribed & extorted Zelenski to announce an investigation into his political opponent.

  11. 3. velj
  12. Odgovor korisniku/ci
  13. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Maybe you can tell us how a corrupt lawyer that was in the room represented a criminal at a trial. That only works when the is running the trial. Everyone of you cowards should start packing your offices. America is coming for you.

  14. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Constitutional Laws require you to take a Stand...?

  15. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    ,noimpeachment

  16. 1. velj
  17. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    2020 has really sucked so far

  18. 1. velj

    was NOT exonerated. Still a con man, a liar, and a cheater , ,

  19. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    There were , so there was in the Senate, as there should have been.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.