Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 1. velj

    Rest of that sentence: “Mr McConnell’s office even advised the president’s legal team throughout the process on which arguments were important to be made on the floor to resonate with certain undecided senators.” Call it what it was: a

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. 4. velj

    He should! especially b/c of this: “IT’S PAYBACK TIME”: WITH ACQUITTAL CERTAIN, TRUMP PLOTS REVENGE ON BOLTON, IMPEACHMENT ENEMIES "Trial"

  3. 4. velj

    As Trump trial nears end, Sen. Manchin calls for censure. And it begins..."If We just 'control' HIM all is Good"?? To F-ing late! HE will do just what YOU said, "ANYTHING HE WANTS!" Idiots!

  4. 3. velj
  5. 3. velj
  6. 3. velj
  7. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    "NYU law Professor Stephen Gillers: Trump defense lawyer acted as an “unsworn witness masquerading as a lawyer.” This should lead to an instant demand for a

  8. 2. velj

    Destruction of democracy, violation of the Constitution, for short-term power and greed: A guilty, corrupt politician looks to his cronies to excuse him for his crimes. Trump’s impending acquittal could have profound ramifications.

  9. 1. velj

    I know the . ⁦⁩ lead ⁦⁩ to a in withholding relevant evidence and, as a juror, in colluding with the defendant.

  10. Was any of Trump's def team in Impeachment trial not corrupt? First it's Pat Cipollone, colluding with Trump on the Ukraine scheme 👇 and now . He isn't allowed to participate in a partisan trial!! 👇

  11. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    White House Counsel was involved. House demanded information /evidence 10 days before trial. It was never provided. What a disgusting cover up. . 😂 😂😂😂😂

  12. 1. velj

    In any other court in America, or any democratic nation, denial of evidence and witnesses would be seen as a Sad. via

  13. 31. sij

    @JaySekulhas been found to be a crook in an post earlier today. The HOUSE must call for a

  14. 31. sij

    , Trump's attorney Cipollone knowingly lied to the Senate, thereby breaching his professional duty of candor. The “advocate-witness rule” — says that when a lawyer should be a witness at trial they cannot be an advocate. !

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.