Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 15 sati

    Finally out: Haplotype Threading: Accurate Polyploid Phasing from Long Reads Very proud.

  2. 22. kol 2018.

    These authors write that "Most readers do not read the methods". For the record, I read the methods section of papers. This paper didn't have one. The authors just made stuff up and wrote a paper. . h/t

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. 21. lip 2018.

    Her earlier work actually contained detailed flow charts, so I'll have to blame the lack of code above on space constraints (!). This is from the earliest publication I know that describes bioinformatics performed with a computer, in 1962.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 4. tra 2019.

    First PhD study out! •Non-time-loss incidence depends on the person recording •Time-loss incidence not affected → Beware when interpreting studies using broad injury definitions and multiple recorders

  5. 15. pro 2019.

    Very nice work by Simoneau and colleagues - although, I am getting goose bumps at trying to digest Fig.2 (and this is really not a rant on pie charts 🙃)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. 4. pro 2017.
  7. 9. stu 2019.

    Benchmarking of tools is an essential element of genomic data science. Check out this special issue of devoted to benchmark studies!

  8. 4. kol 2018.

    I wonder who introduced Uzzah to the idea that methodology was not important? Any “thinking” person knows transporting the ark on a cart was more progressive and efficient than the outdated means of using poles. Hmmm...

  9. 4. lip 2018.

    New paper from from Joshua Levin's group! Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5′-end RNA-sequencing methods

  10. 16. kol 2018.

    Sampling the microbiome is full of instrument error, reagent bias, and biological confounders. So is all research. Use controls, run replicates, quantify your error, and approach all results with skepticism. Just like all research.

  11. People don't necessarily realize that such citations are important to seek funding to maintain and continue development of such tools/packages. By not doing this, they are hurting the entire scientific community. Give credit where credit is due.

  12. 1. velj

    Fantastic analysis of how GTF and cDNA FASTA differ; performed by my colleague

  13. 30. sij
  14. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    For those studies where batch is an unavoidable factor (not certain if it’s the case here, will read when I can get past the paywall), batch correction is an important and often overlooked component of data analysis...and this speaks to . 1/2

  15. 3. pro 2019.

    If you are interested in analyzing data in using , please check out our paper Orchestrating single-cell analysis (OSCA) with that was published in this week!

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 15. stu 2019.

    The method section in 's article, "Toward a Dynamic Theory of Action at the Micro Level of Genocide: Killing, Desistance, and Saving in 1994 Rwanda" is so good that I had my intro to qual methods class read it out loud today.

  17. 6. stu 2019.
  18. 1. stu 2019.

    Day after day... this strange jerk of a man tweets out nonsensical statements yet because he has accumulated wealth and power... we are forced to listen...even though the means by which that wealth was attained is criminal.

  19. 6. lis 2019.

    Hey someone has to develop those methods, and they are good data scientists too. As someone who thinks about methods, I’m sorta offended by your tweet.

  20. 20. ruj 2019.

    Special shout out to and who set this up. If you're not following them on you should do so immediately. Many more exciting single-cell RNA-seq methods coming from them soon. 🐻🚌🛠️ 12/12.

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.