Search results
  1. 17 hours ago
    Replying to

    You are correct that feminism is different from misandry, but permitting or practicing male genital mutilation while opposing female genital mutilation is a double-standard that reinforces societal misandry. As a doctor, you should know better.

  2. 3 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Over my 30 years of practice, 5 female patients have had cancer of the vulva vs zero males with cancer of the penis

  3. 5 hours ago

    Regarding the ignorance of US drs, this comes to mind: “It’s difficult to get a man to understanding, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” ~Upton Sinclair For US drs, circumcision is money, money, money. AAP = all about profit

  4. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Who is trying to undermine gravity? Those wishing to show circumcision harms, or those who want to show it does? 🤔

  5. 28 Dec 2018

    American doctors in a nutshell.

  6. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Um, circumcision logic is such. It’s circumcision advocates suggesting anything needs to be removed to prevent (insert your favorite disease here) not us. Don’t equivocate.

  7. 11 hours ago
    Replying to

    There is stupidity, and then there is willful stupidity. She can’t have a genuine interest in public health when she has religious, possibly financial convictions to defend the practice.

  8. 9 hours ago

    I need to ask, WHY is a mother discussing the sexual preferences of her son’s girlfriends with them? What else would a girl tell them? “Your penis is so small.” 🙄

    Show this thread
  9. Jan 4
    Replying to and

    The convo is the same. Stop segregating, aggrandizing one issue while minimizing, erasing the other.

  10. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    They aren’t “comparable” because they’re IDENTICAL. Anyone denying this hasn’t actually looked. LOOK. We dare you.

  11. 7 hours ago

    You are mistaken on my intentions, but I do think forced genital alteration for social conformity is sad. However I do recognize parents who do it almost always do so with good intentions.

  12. 6 hours ago
    Replying to

    Thank you so much for speaking out. International peers calling out the weird and unethical bias toward newborn circumcision in the American medical establishment is very helpful.

  13. Public service announcement. THIS is a description of normal penis. Do NOT retract a baby's foreskin! For some reason I saw a mother who was told to do so by MULTIPLE pediatricians and urologists, and a couple told her to circumcise her baby. Glad baby saw me.

    Show this thread
  14. 7 hours ago

    It's probably not the only time this person has harmed a child this way. Complaints on their record may make a difference.

  15. Jan 4
    Replying to

    Mocking tweet didn’t quite turn out how she wanted it, so she deletes it at best, or merely blocks all dissent at worst. Good thing you saved this. She was obviously being torn apart!

  16. Jan 4
    Replying to and

    “one shouldn’t be shut down bc men have decided women have spoken about it enough” Who is “shutting the conversation down?” I’ll let readers decide. It’s women who are pro-male cutting. No one wants to shut down the convo of , but people want to erase boys. ENOUGH.

  17. Jan 4

    Evolution did not make a mistake with the foreskin: it is there for a reason.

  18. 4 hours ago
    Replying to and

    As opposed to: “Penile cancer is rare in North America and Europe. It's diagnosed in less than 1 man in 100,000 each year and accounts for less than 1% of cancers in men in the United States.”

  19. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    “In the United States, women have a 1 in 333 chance of developing vulvar cancer at some point during their life.”

  20. 10 hours ago

    Circumcision is not a Surgical Vaccine … … … … … … … … … … …

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.