Search results
  1. 3 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Over my 30 years of practice, 5 female patients have had cancer of the vulva vs zero males with cancer of the penis

  2. 3 hours ago

    Nee, deze man protesteert tegen de schending van zijn lichamelijke integriteit, motivatie van ouders maakt niet uit, ze hebben het recht niet. Amnesty negeert dit volledig. “Artikel 3 Eenieder heeft het recht op leven, vrijheid en onschendbaarheid van zijn persoon”

  3. 4 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Circumcision logic tells us we should perform radical vulvectomies on all baby girls at birth, because it prevents cancer, and, girls can still enjoy sex. Does it sound like faulty logic? That’s because it is.

  4. 4 hours ago
    Replying to and

    As opposed to: “Penile cancer is rare in North America and Europe. It's diagnosed in less than 1 man in 100,000 each year and accounts for less than 1% of cancers in men in the United States.”

  5. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    “In the United States, women have a 1 in 333 chance of developing vulvar cancer at some point during their life.”

  6. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    They aren’t “comparable” because they’re IDENTICAL. Anyone denying this hasn’t actually looked. LOOK. We dare you.

  7. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    What a stupid argument. We can’t say they’re the same this is supposed to be immediately self-evident? Really, you need to find a new line. It makes you look like you don’t know what you’re talking about.

  8. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Please spare us the histrionics and tell us why forcibly cutting boys is OK, but not girls. Sexist, self-serving BULLSHIT. NO MORE segregation. Basic human rights for all.

  9. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Is “oppression” really the problem here? Because was introduced to the west as a way to prevent masturbation. Is it really a matter of intent? Would be justified for “medical” reasons?

  10. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Who is trying to undermine gravity? Those wishing to show circumcision harms, or those who want to show it does? 🤔

  11. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Um, circumcision logic is such. It’s circumcision advocates suggesting anything needs to be removed to prevent (insert your favorite disease here) not us. Don’t equivocate.

  12. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Hrm... using babies... who is using babies for their own personal agenda... those who want to forcibly cut off part of their genitals, or those speaking out against the abhorrent practice... 🤔

  13. 5 hours ago

    Sounds like a reincarnation of Dr. Laura.

  14. 5 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Because Jews are the only people in the world who circumcise you know? 🙄

  15. 5 hours ago
  16. 5 hours ago
    Replying to

    Information doctors in other English-speaking countries know...

  17. 5 hours ago
  18. 5 hours ago

    Mother shares her experience with American charlatanism:

  19. 5 hours ago

    Regarding the ignorance of US drs, this comes to mind: “It’s difficult to get a man to understanding, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” ~Upton Sinclair For US drs, circumcision is money, money, money. AAP = all about profit

  20. 5 hours ago

    This seems to be the modus operandi of most, if not all pro-circ advocates who are challenged. Almost as if they’re afraid of being shown up by factual information or something. 🤷‍♂️

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.