Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Odgovor korisnicima

    The "case" developed by was horrible. Built on bad evidence; biased opinions & Partisan hatred drove Dems to foolishly Vote to Impeach, w/o real evidence of true offenses. Right Result: ❌ 𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 for a bold Christian Voice.

  2. prije 12 sati

    To Whom It May Concern will destroy everything you love. ❤️ Touch lives. Change the world. @ The Cathedral of Nine

  3. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Oh yes... fair... just like how the House didn't allow any cross examination, no questioning of , no witnesses for . ... and of course, allowed , which is inadmissible in a court of law.

  4. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    It strikes me that the only hearsay at this trial is the hearsay that Trump may have had non-corrupt motives--and that they could override his corrupt motives. The corruption is well documented.

  5. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    He said. He said.

  6. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    If you proved your case, why would you need more witnesses?? is not proof.

  7. 2. velj

    Just provide actual evidence... doesn't count

  8. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The only way to find out if the death toll is under stated, would be to compare seasonally adjusted funeral home and crematory numbers. I Heard reports they are working overtime.

  9. 31. sij

    STOP.... why are we allowed to use a liberal news media to be submitted into a trial. It’s all and it’s Pardison. it’s not a fact. 🇺🇸

  10. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Please continue ur lies to the ppl

  11. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    When congress refuses to not allow an American to go to court and assert their rights instead of the given recently by .. How can it be said the law is being enforced? Showing America - you are now GUILTY, we have the .

  12. If only these Senators had a way to hear the answers directly. Don't look to Jim Jordan for that answer.

  13. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Considering when the impeachment started - 2016 and over 3 years trying to manufacture a reason, partly spent in the SCIFF with and the - and still using for evidence today. What is relevant? Is aka: the ?

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.