Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. Odgovor korisnicima

    ... a thread related to

  2. 9. tra 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    is risible.

  3. 8. tra 2019.

    Word of the day: Erisology is the study of disagreement, specifically the study of unsuccessful disagreement. An unsuccessful disagreement is an exchange where people are no closer in understanding at the end...

  4. 31. sij 2019.

    How to improve things? One idea would be to separate intra-tribal from inter-tribal communication but that isn't going to happen. The best we can do is boring: improve understanding of how all this works so we can avoid at least the stuff coming from misunderstandings.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  5. 18. svi 2018.

    This statement (and ' whole idea of ) resonates _a lot_ with what I've been thinking about lately: "…behind disagreement on even the most concrete things there is often one or several undissolved philosophical issues being discussed by proxy…"

  6. . “Most people really are tired of shouting matches and want more nuance (according to surveys etc.),” he wrote to me, “and I hope we will develop some cultural immunity towards ragebait and hyperzealotry soon.” Thanks for sharing so...

  7. 4. velj 2019.

    Too broad perhaps, but this is an aspect of "dysfunctional disagreements".

  8. 3. lis 2018.

    The predictable result is that those who like the conclusion accept the argument as valid and those who don't, don't — and they'll have trouble pinpointing the exact nature of their disagreement because it's distributed throughout the system. END

    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. 8. tra 2019.

    : The New Science of How to Argue—Constructively. Can we get this to work in the world?

  10. 5. svi 2019.

    Did one of the previous tweets make you upset or baffled? I think that people with different ideas about gender can understand each other to some extent, but contextualizers and decouplers are incomprehensible aliens to one another. 4/4

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. 7. tra 2019.

    It’s a thing! This is a fascinating read, replete with concepts that lend themselves to just the sort of “talking past each other” issues that erisology purports to address.

  12. 12. tra 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Maybe the thing should just be studied on twitter

  13. 24. tra 2019.

    Do u argue about anything? Do u know someone who is like that? Disagreement is central to our lives online. ‘Erisologists’ want to study it more systematically. Aloha! Kihei Condo King

  14. 31. lis 2018.

    First piece of outright fiction I've seen. Really wish I'd thought of it.

  15. 21. ruj 2018.

    An coherent argument, resolved with the coordinated development and release of ’s hidden service support and ’s Alt-Svc header support.

  16. 11. tra 2019.

    For an argument to be constructive, it is important that both parties are arguing for and against the same thought - in the internet world, this is a rarity

  17. 16. stu 2018.

    How about something long and complicated? It's about a spicy topic... Let's cut the sucker open.

  18. 23. tra 2019.

    IF twitter is the of WHERE IS MY TWITTER DIOGENES TO TEAR APART THE VERY (shitty) LOGIC OF THIS QUIZ PLZ sigh I am disappoint

    Prikaži ovu nit
  19. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Can't wait to dig in! I'm interested in the how/why people disagree as related to the and your past posts (and "made up" word/study of ) have been very insightful.

  20. 1. svi 2019.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.