Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 7 sati

    Computerized voting is a bad idea. It only makes democracy more opaque. Why do politicians keep falling for it?

  2. prije 9 sati

    Attorney & Election Integrity Advocate has researched this issue completely & says that cannot be secured so should never be used in elections. Totally scrapped. Read Jennifer Cohn's articles here. >

  3. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Who is going to understand the proof? Granny? Nephew? Also, handling material ballots (the papertrail) involves a much, much larger proof of work.

  4. prije 3 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    2x falsch: die Unterschrift ist nicht für –, oder gegen den Vaterschaftsurlaub, sondern für –, oder gegen eine Abstimmung. Unser (im Bild) — vom Artikel sonst unberührt — ist aber hoffentlich eindeutig genug ✦gegen✦ unsicheres . /

  5. "“Imagine this operational failure where we don't have individual voter-verified paper ballots to go back to,"

  6. prije 7 sati

    Hoffentlich haben unsere - Anhänger etwas aus dem gelernt. - niemals!

  7. prije 8 sati

    Never ever Auch wenn die App funktioniert hätte, es blieben immer unwiderlegbare Zweifel. Kein papertrail, keine Sicherheit.

  8. prije 8 sati
  9. prije 9 sati

    Seems like technology is not stable enough for yet.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. prije 10 sati
  11. prije 10 sati
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Or, they can use open source software, audited by professionals and community alike.

  12. prije 10 sati

    The Iowa Caucus debacle will (unfortunately) influence e-voting for the next decade. With proper planning, testing, training, and a key mgt plan (passcodes) this could have all been avoided.

  13. prije 10 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    YES! Exactly Rodney. Touchy databases should NOT be used EVER. NO (easy to hack), NO electronic voting rolls (easy to delete/suppress) & NO computer apps for reporting (they can fail). Must use & >Follow on Evoting info.

  14. prije 12 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    jetzt! 🤣 "ein programmierfehler" 🙄🤣

  15. As the concerns about e-voting grew after the Iowa caucus vote, I’m getting excited to rewrite my conference paper about the e-voting experience on NTU student elections!

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. prije 16 sati

    is gaining its place in growing discussion over the use of . Latest experiment of e-voting is in , city of . of this system is rooted in an experiment of participatory .

  17. prije 19 sati

    ist ein Musterbeispiel warum man den Technologielevel bei Wahlen gering halten sollte. Stichwort:

  18. prije 21 sat

    Is / compliant with the very idea ? A pen, piece of paper and a booth does not fail as often as or the broadband. It’s also provided at the booth for free.

  19. prije 23 sata

    (Cr)app tasked with reporting the results of the has crashed. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️💩 (Note the underlying technology that didn't fail: . Almost as if introduces stupid, unnecessary new risks for no good reason...)

  20. 3. velj

    Wann kommt endlich ? Im Gegensatz zu harmlos und einfach umzusetzen!

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.