Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 8 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    "The Case for (sic)" is just a collection of known P.R.A.T.T. lies that have been refuted for decades or longer. Everything in his book was already addressed BEFORE he wrote it down=-->

  2. prije 10 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Did you notice how everyone replying is pointing out that your claim is a total joke. They won't, because, unlike you, they know the difference between what is and your cult of , which only has mythology for "evidence".

  3. 4. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    LOLZ Are you really trying to claim that EXTANT species are the same that existed during the ~65 million year ago K-T (K-Pg) extinction event???

  4. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    WRONG. The OBSERVATION that fossils are in an order that is both predicted by and explained by shows you 1) are either LYING or 2) have NO understanding of this topic and are only interested in trolling your ignorance and incredulity of reality.

  5. 3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:
  6. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:
  7. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    C14 dating can only be used on substances which obtained their carbon from the ATMOSPHERE. We also know how C14 occurs in diamonds due to radiation in the rocks surrounding them.

  8. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.