Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 3 sata

    This is significant news for & independent oversight in & a victory for of the . But Malawi has no -it must've been the High Court that ruled against the Commission's decisions.

  2. prije 3 sata

    Factual inaccuracies by major outlets, & w/copy-paste reports. There's no in . The High Court of Malawi undertakes Judicial Review of the Electoral Commission's actions/decisions re:

  3. With the around the corner, it's important to make sure your students are informed. Encourage eligible high schoolers to exercise their right and !

  4. 2. velj
  5. 1. velj

    “Lawmakers from Mr. Trump’s party defended the chief executive’s right to resist congressional oversight, a precedent that won’t be forgotten. “

  6. 1. velj
  7. 1. velj
  8. 1. velj

    This article below reality. 's defense team NEVER conceded . On the contrary, they argued that even should he have had motives ascribed by Managers, the charges do not rise to the level required

  9. 31. sij

    Great piece here by dean William Treanor, who has been doing deep dive & analysis on the understudied Gouverneur Morris. Why Morris's views during the key debates of the convention of 1787 changed --and why that matters.

  10. 30. sij

    The arguments of 's Defense Team have no or basis. They are nothing but for Trump's base. Analysis: ' questions show most minds made up

  11. 29. sij
  12. 28. sij

    Bringing up his patriotism and his parents immigration history, also tried to address law of . Alas, it did not work effectively😳 : Noncriminal Conduct Is Outside Range of Impeachable Offenses via

  13. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Mr. You fail to realize or remind yourself of ALL the TRUMP has broken. HE IS A SERIOUS to this COUNTRY! has & continues to BREAK ! He NEVER COMPLIES w/ANY LAWS!

  14. 27. sij
  15. 27. sij

    The consequences are paramount. Read this: The Fight Over Witnesses Is Really a Fight Against Trump’s Obstruction

  16. 8. sij

    You are intentionally trying to neuter the mandated powers - with specific regards to only? Why? What are you protecting or afraid of? A vote for this is ⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦

  17. 18. pro 2019.

    Gah what a day for B Franklin, A Ham, Geo Wash, T Jeff & more. Thanks to & for noting the importance of Eliza Willing Powell, as reported in the key writing's of convention delegate fr Maryland, J McHenry.

  18. The court has highlighted the need for authorities like the and the to be faithful to morality and not vacillate under “prevailing political pressures.”

  19. This year marks the 200th anniversary of the ’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland. Nearly all writers consider McCulloch one of the Supreme Court’s most important cases. They are correct to do so. Commentary by Rob Natelson

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.