Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. prije 33 minute

    Brief synopsis of your salad: 1) So was INDEED PARTISAN - 2) Conduct was "serious threat to our Govt. institutions" 3) For U brush aside the term though it is IN THE CONSTITUTION 4) He's neither a threat nor ABUSED PWR

  2. prije 4 sata
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    at least also had a high standard during yet, 14 of the current voted to convict for lying about a blowjob!

  3. 3. velj

    The reports that 11 million TV viewers watched day one of the , far exceeding the 2.3 million who tuned in to day one of the 1999 . Shows was right, Give the people what they want and they'll turn out.

  4. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    It’s sounds like the same thing the Republicans said during the

  5. & are all but enduring a re-election by their hysterical hypocrisy in not accepting the outcome of the which was the same as the . should have a commercial field day.

  6. 31. sij
  7. So correct me if I am wrong with there were tens of thousands of pages of documents, witnesses called, no obstruction... yet the current “President” gets to block all of this and cynically call it a “trial” I can’t believe how F up this is...

  8. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    There was in the & every ever. Senate Republicans scored a decisive victory in laying out a process for securing the videotaped testimony of Lewinsky, presidential friend Jordan and White House aide Blumenthal.

  9. 31. sij
  10. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Sounds like another case for impeachment.

  11. 31. sij

    . argues if the House case is overwhelming, they don't need witnesses. In , Rs had "case" created by & Senate R&D leaders agreed to 3 witnesses. Then, they agreed to fairness Today, it's about sweeping case under rug in time for

  12. 31. sij

    Isn't this the same argument said about him changing the views he had during the 🤔

  13. 30. sij
  14. 30. sij

    Having trouble understanding the 'there is a difference!' crowd comparing the to the knowing that on Inauguration Day, 1/20/1993, minority in Congress were already plotting to impeach President Clinton in any way possible.

  15. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    You just might want to sit this one out.

  16. Odgovor korisniku/ci
  17. 30. sij

    shouldn’t appeal to

  18. Can you even believe the is trying to make the case the Dems Trump is the gateway to endless POTUS impeachments? Guess they just forgot (highly partisan, LOTS of witnesses) and that THEY ran that one.

  19. 29. sij

    A trial where witnesses are threatened or paid off is the type trial wants? REMEMBER WOMEN ?

  20. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    you didn’t do ANY research before being part of the ? Hahahahahahahahahahaha You’re admitting that -and what’s more - using it as a defense for flip-flopping? You are an embarrassment to your school. You’re seeing this, right ?

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.