Rezultati pretraživanja
  1. 31. sij

    Cipollone, Mr. With-All-Due-Respect, now that we KNOW you were IN the room, what can YOU tell us?

  2. 31. sij

    must be disbarred. That's a fucking disgrace. I'm a lawyer and I'm positive I'd be disbarred if I had been in the Oval hearing that in May and then months layer stood in the well of the Senate and lied lied fucking lied. Pathetic.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. 31. sij

    Schiff is now warning Senators that if they vote to acquit after refusing to hear from witnesses, everyone will know the acquittal is meaningless and the trial a sham. You'd think the revelations about Cipollone would at least give them pause.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 31. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    The facts are coming out faster than they can pervert the course of justice. They had an inside man in the House proceedings(Nunes), now we know Cipollone is their inside man in the Senate trial.

  5. 31. sij

    is complicit! should retract her statements and vote for witnesses in the interest of America!

  6. 31. sij

    Remember all the "we don't knows" trying to argue there wasn't proof the the Pres was involved? Turns out *he* knew.

  7. 31. sij

    Advocate & Witness? How Is This Legal? Can Anyone Explain, Really, Why This Wouldn't Be A Mistrial Or Why Isn't Disbarred Immediately?

  8. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    They were all in on it! & he stood up there lying right in front of the Chief Justice, the Senate, & Americans! had also been warned on 1/21/20 that he was named as a material witness & it brought on a great risk to play both roles as advocate & witness!

  9. Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:
  10. 31. sij

    Well today we know why! and he is suspect as an accomplice

  11. 31. sij

    Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting Cipollone was in the meeting

  12. 31. sij
  13. Can a protest be made by House Managers that Cippilone by removed? It seems like a Supreme Court Justice would have something to say about what Bolton alleges.

  14. 31. sij

    I'm sayin'! and so should be recused himself as 's attorney. So much conflict of interest in this entire process, i.e. McConnell, Johnson, Nunes, Barr, Perry, et al.

  15. 31. sij
  16. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I think the next thread to pull is and an inquiry into him would require Bolton to testify. Maybe Lev too

  17. 31. sij

    Ummm, I’m not a fancy ethics professor like 🙄, but if I’m a potential witness, don’t I have an ethical duty to withdraw?🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Seriously, if Trump’s lawyers keep their law licenses, it’ll just show the toothlessness of legal ethics.

  18. 31. sij

    Gotta hand it to Pat Cipollone with his big ass balls who was in the room during every meeting with trump Giuliani Bolton about the Ukraine shakedown and lied every fucking time denying there was never a shakedown when he addresses the Senate

  19. 31. sij

    You can’t make this SHIT UP!

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.