Search results

  1. People View all

  2. 1 hour ago

    How the vote was tainted. ⁦⁩ explains yesterday’s court judgment & the implications for & the . It’s time to ask how a vote procured by lies & illegality can be allowed to stand

    11 replies 130 retweets 167 likes
  3. 23 hours ago

    Well done & thread below gives headlines on English High Courts damning verdict on the Electoral Commission & conduct re referendum spending. Looks like there could be implications for too. My cup runneth over

    In an action brought by and funded by you via the HC has just found that the Electoral Commission erred in law. I will publish a full analysis shortly – link to follow – but the headlines are these. THREAD
    Show this thread
    32 replies 660 retweets 1,009 likes
  4. 13 hours ago

    Can someone point us to the campaign document that said house prices would crash by 35%, the car industry and 800,000 jobs would disappear and we'd be stockpiling food and medicines? We appear to have misplaced it.

    9 replies 231 retweets 382 likes
  5. 2 hours ago

    So broke electoral law on three counts, and the Electoral Commission advised them incorrectly on one count. So my question is: Was this all part of the plan, or merely an oversight? or not? Whatever the answer the was a Frauderendum. Re-run?

    1 reply 6 retweets 7 likes
  6. 21 hours ago

    We already knew cheated. Now the High Court rules that they were also wrongly allowed by the Electoral Commission do things they shouldn’t. The basis for looking ever dodgier

    58 replies 854 retweets 1,203 likes
  7. 1 hour ago

    I wait, with baited breath, to see whether this story makes the national headlines, in the same manner as the initial findings against did - Call me a cynic, but somehow this narrative doesn’t fit the media’s incessant “stop ” message.

  8. 10 minutes ago

    Jacob Rees-Mogg has become half a million pounds richer since Brexit vote.... The real reason for Time for change Time for ⁦⁩

    1 retweet
  9. Sep 13

    Our crowdfund to prosecute will shortly hit £55,000. Very happy with this for our first week. 5 more left. This isn’t about stopping , the courts can’t force that. It’s about ending lying in UK politics. fund us here:

    9 replies 182 retweets 246 likes
  10. 37 minutes ago

    So was vindicated & didn’t break the law after all that Remainiac rubbish. Question whatever happened to that big conservative fraud claim over Thanet when was defeated illegally £ Torres overspent + a police investigation went very quiet

    1 retweet 2 likes
  11. 2 minutes ago

    The real reason behind the wealthy supporters of Brexit on 23 June 2016..?? : Commission launches work to create first common EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions 15 September 2016... Time for change Time for ⁦⁩

  12. 21 hours ago

    Amazing. Electoral Commission told it could act unlawfully. Vote Leave went on & acted unlawfully. When found out, Electoral Commission/Vote Leave worked together to pretend nothing happened. High Court finds against EC/Vote Leave.) Mandate for Brexit weaker then ever.

    In an action brought by and funded by you via the HC has just found that the Electoral Commission erred in law. I will publish a full analysis shortly – link to follow – but the headlines are these. THREAD
    Show this thread
    3 replies 25 retweets 25 likes
  13. 22 hours ago

    So, looks like will get away with . Also seem to have got away with laughable & verifiable . Puzzling WHY TF people still believe these charlatans

    4 retweets 5 likes
  14. 20 hours ago

    Short clear thread from on High Court ruling finding that the Electoral Commission erred in law, thereby unwittingly contributing to law breaking endeavours

    2 replies 1 retweet
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  15. Sep 12
    Replying to

    suddenly i’m 🤪🤪

    1 reply
  16. 17 hours ago

    A serious black eye for on What next though... declare the result null and void? Looks like VL will say “It’s not us Guv, those ElectoralCommission guys screwed up”.

    In an action brought by and funded by you via the HC has just found that the Electoral Commission erred in law. I will publish a full analysis shortly – link to follow – but the headlines are these. THREAD
    Show this thread
    1 reply
  17. Sep 12

    Honestly twitter these days you dont make me laugh so much but this made coffee come out of my nose. Thank you for giving us the factual abyss that is All that passion without any constraint of evidence

    1 reply
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  18. 20 hours ago
    Replying to

    So keep freedom of movement, soft borders, not doing deals outside EU we couldn't do inside, paying a divorce bill and taking laws without a say? Traitor, no one voted for that. 🦄

  19. 21 hours ago
    Replying to

    Mr Smith - Can you understand English? The article says nothing of the sort. The High Court ruling maintains that through channelling campaign funds via to escape cap limits. If we were we would be very worried about the consequences.

    1 reply
  20. 21 hours ago
    Replying to

    That is a gross misinterpretation of today’s High Court ruling, which upheld that it was illegal for to “channel” campaign spending through Darren Grimes’ outfit. The ruling was that Electoral Commision should not have advised it was OK.

    1 reply
  21. Sep 10
    Replying to

    OOOh a close call between the remoaners peoples vote & the sanity of the leave campaigns no deal. Could this be another FAILED FBPE poll doing the rounds? 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧👍🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    4 replies 2 retweets 1 like
  22. Sep 11
    Replying to

    Just looked up Populus... no names appended. Maybe ask Thomas Borwick, ex CTO, son of your former colleague Victoria Borwick? Looks like his line of country.

    1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.