Search results
  1. People View all

  2. 13 hours ago

    So thankful for I guess the libs are mad at Russia because Hillary’s Uranium one bribe didn’t produce the results that she wanted. 🤑

  3. Sep 9
    Replying to and

    in fact take the example. MSM never reports on anything really that goes against government as a whole. So why did they choose to divide right and left over seth rich.. once again if you know their tactics you can see right through them =)

  4. Sep 9
    Replying to

    lest we forget

  5. Spell out his name! His name is !

  6. Sep 8

    We have reason to believe he is in witness protection

  7. 17 hours ago
    Replying to and

    You mean and are still alive?

  8. 8 hours ago
    Replying to and
  9. 21 hours ago
  10. 3 hours ago

    It’s funny will investigate and report on but they won’t investigate and report on and how so many top level and have been fired. Right, no & the media’s not involved.

  11. 11 hours ago

    Do YOU know the truth about ? Do YOU know the truth about ? Do YOU know the truth about ? Okay then.

  12. 19 hours ago
    Replying to

    9/11 Flight Attendant (seen in this vid) the next ? Shes in danger zone. I'm not jinxing her cuz she talks about that possibility, when she does she minimizes her potential death dismissing any sorrow w/wink of an eye. Brave woman.

  13. Sep 10
    Show this thread
  14. 19 hours ago

    Will ever get justice or will this just make it seem to wild to be true that everyone exposing clinton crimes ends up dead or missing?

  15. Sep 9
    Replying to and

    lilith2u blocked me because of actually.. pretty crazy

  16. Sep 10
    Replying to

    Mac, Eyes Wide Shut. WDC for you. Clinton's a fucking joke. keep going for data.

  17. Sep 10

    Controversies don't disappear anymore, they just fade away. The matter has unprecedented staying power. His murder would have been sadly unremarkable if not for his employment. I lived in for several yrs; that was my (& 's) neighborhd... (1/2)

    Show this thread
  18. 18 hours ago

    so perhaps it means 'we () protect sources because it appears someone () may have been murdered because they were mistaken as the source' and seems the more likely especially if one considers the rest of what has been said

  19. Sep 9
    Show this thread
  20. 6 hours ago
    Replying to

    Again BS, context totally wrong just like that piece about a a democratic staffer that butchered up as red meat to you and your base of trumpets. Absolutely no credibility, from or this .

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.