Search results
  1. 4 hours ago

    Repealing as part of the Defense bill (NDAA) Senate will vote on next month is one of the best ideas I’ve heard in a while

    367 replies 2,897 retweets 11,036 likes

  2. People View all

  3. Nov 17

    .: When you label tweets, you’re taking a policy position. When you’re taking a policy position, you’re a publisher, even under current law. You’re entitled to take a policy position, but you don’t get to pretend you’re not a publisher & get benefits.

    1,228 replies 4,044 retweets 14,243 likes
  4. Nov 17

    If we don’t take action now to rein in the corporations, they will run this country. That means repealing and it means updated antitrust laws for 21st century

    500 replies 2,764 retweets 8,437 likes
  5. Nov 17

    What is ? WATCH 👇

    13 replies 121 retweets 281 likes
  6. Nov 18

    When Big-Tech labels tweets, they're taking a policy position. They're acting as publishers and therefore should not receive the benefits of As explains, it's just that simple.

    81 replies 272 retweets 1,105 likes
  7. Nov 19

    lawsuit SCOTUS Docket #20-632 I welcome the United States Solicitor General, States Attorney's General, and Congress from either political party to weigh in on my Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari in FYK vs. FACEBOOK

    25 replies 874 retweets 3,045 likes
  8. Nov 17

    If you really want to understand 230 you may want to read this then go check out Supreme Court Docket #20-632 Section 230 has been applied incorrectly and to broadly for it's entire existence by California Courts I'm fighting this for everyone

    2 replies 22 retweets 36 likes
  9. Nov 19

    Justice Clarence Thomas said this is the type of case that the S.C. should look at! This would change everything!

    lawsuit SCOTUS Docket #20-632 I welcome the United States Solicitor General, States Attorney's General, and Congress from either political party to weigh in on my Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari in FYK vs. FACEBOOK
    8 replies 365 retweets 1,304 likes
  10. Nov 17

    A new hashtag that is going to become as important as is #20-632 which is the docket number for my Supreme Court fight against Facebook.

    1 reply 18 retweets 48 likes
  11. 4 hours ago
    Replying to

    It is one of the worst ideas I have ever seen. A full repeal of will do nothing more than destroy a free and fair internet.

    20 replies 19 likes
  12. Nov 18

    BOOM. 🚨🚨💣💣⬇️⬇️

    2:31
    .: When you label tweets, you’re taking a policy position. When you’re taking a policy position, you’re a publisher, even under current law. You’re entitled to take a policy position, but you don’t get to pretend you’re not a publisher & get benefits.
    1 reply 14 retweets 26 likes
  13. Nov 17

    Congress keeps dragging big tech in but nothing gets done. I'm doing something about We are closing the door on unlimited editorial conduct and censorship.

    1 reply 12 retweets 19 likes
  14. Nov 17

    The amendment details allegations re: how accomplishes its through its surrogate "fact-checkers" who are neither "independent" nor objective + why this agency relationship can't insulate them from liability under .

    3 replies 89 retweets 175 likes
  15. 2 hours ago

    It's time to repeal the special protections Congress gave Twitter & Facebook. has abused to selectively suppress the ideas they don't like.

    3:22
    is not even trying to hide its bias anymore. They’ve made the decision to apply their policies in a partisan & selective manner to silence views they don’t agree with.
    2 replies 5 retweets 17 likes
  16. 1 hour ago

    This is the kind of QUALITY content we'll lose if is repealed.

    0:18
    Opera singers dubbed with dial up modems
    1 reply 8 likes
  17. Nov 17

    Read 's full position on 👇 "We must not entrench the largest companies further."

    9 retweets 43 likes
  18. Nov 18

    Great monologue by highlighting the censorship concerns I raised yesterday at our hearing with & . Big Tech cannot be a publisher AND take advantage of special benefits under -- that’s not how this works.

    296 replies 712 retweets 2,885 likes
  19. 5 hours ago

    This is the most wholesome content and I'm here for it 🥺

    I often quote the Ninth Circuit’s Roommates decision, warning that eroding would force "websites to face death by ten thousand duck-bites" [of litigation] This is what I mean
    14 likes
  20. 22 hours ago

    Facebook Censorship Case Hits Supreme Court Docket

    2 replies 27 retweets 44 likes
  21. Nov 11

    My piece in the Penthouse about the catastrophic clash of politics, corporate, culture, and liberty.

    51 replies 92 retweets 370 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.