Search results
  1. 4 hours ago

    Repealing as part of the Defense bill (NDAA) Senate will vote on next month is one of the best ideas I’ve heard in a while

  2. People View all

  3. Nov 17

    .: When you label tweets, you’re taking a policy position. When you’re taking a policy position, you’re a publisher, even under current law. You’re entitled to take a policy position, but you don’t get to pretend you’re not a publisher & get benefits.

  4. Nov 17

    If we don’t take action now to rein in the corporations, they will run this country. That means repealing and it means updated antitrust laws for 21st century

  5. Nov 17
  6. Nov 18

    When Big-Tech labels tweets, they're taking a policy position. They're acting as publishers and therefore should not receive the benefits of As explains, it's just that simple.

  7. Nov 19

    lawsuit SCOTUS Docket #20-632 I welcome the United States Solicitor General, States Attorney's General, and Congress from either political party to weigh in on my Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari in FYK vs. FACEBOOK

  8. Nov 17

    If you really want to understand 230 you may want to read this then go check out Supreme Court Docket #20-632 Section 230 has been applied incorrectly and to broadly for it's entire existence by California Courts I'm fighting this for everyone

  9. Nov 19

    Justice Clarence Thomas said this is the type of case that the S.C. should look at! This would change everything!

  10. Nov 17

    A new hashtag that is going to become as important as is #20-632 which is the docket number for my Supreme Court fight against Facebook.

  11. 4 hours ago
    Replying to

    It is one of the worst ideas I have ever seen. A full repeal of will do nothing more than destroy a free and fair internet.

  12. Nov 18
  13. Nov 17

    Congress keeps dragging big tech in but nothing gets done. I'm doing something about We are closing the door on unlimited editorial conduct and censorship.

  14. Nov 17

    The amendment details allegations re: how accomplishes its through its surrogate "fact-checkers" who are neither "independent" nor objective + why this agency relationship can't insulate them from liability under .

  15. It's time to repeal the special protections Congress gave Twitter & Facebook. has abused to selectively suppress the ideas they don't like.

  16. 1 hour ago

    This is the kind of QUALITY content we'll lose if is repealed.

  17. Nov 17

    Read 's full position on 👇 "We must not entrench the largest companies further."

  18. Nov 18

    Great monologue by highlighting the censorship concerns I raised yesterday at our hearing with & . Big Tech cannot be a publisher AND take advantage of special benefits under -- that’s not how this works.

  19. 5 hours ago

    This is the most wholesome content and I'm here for it 🥺

  20. 22 hours ago
  21. Nov 11

    My piece in the Penthouse about the catastrophic clash of politics, corporate, culture, and liberty.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.